ns in Paragraph 5 contain annotations that are wholly inapposite, unprincipled, needlessly inflammatory, and serve no purpose other than to bolster Counter-Plaintiff's allegations and as such no response is warranted. 6. Epstein denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 and demands strict proof thereof. 7.

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's ore genus motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defen

lyze, and scrutinize multiple relevant case documents, including lengthy transcript of the Math 8, 2018 hearing involving Fowler White disk issue, Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause in bankruptcy court and Bankruptcy Court's Order to Show Cause, pertinent Complaints filed in Circuit Court case an

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER COMPELLING EPSTEIN TO PRODUCE SETTLEMENT AMOUNTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Counter-Plaintiff's ore genus motion on December 7, 2017. The Court, having heard argument of counsel does hereby, ORDER AND ADJUDGE that: 1. Plaintiff/Counter-Defen

nt (w/o attachments) 2. Scarola's Memorandum in Opposition (w/o attachments) 3. Transcript of the hearing on our Motion for Summary Judgment 4. Counter-Plaintiff's two Notices of Supplemental Authority 5. Order Granting our Motion for Summary Judgment 6. Final Judgment Please note that the second "Supplemen

control of the Counter- Plaintiff are attached to the extent such documents were to be made available for inspection and copying in accordance with Counter-Plaintiff's Response to Request to Produce dated January 6, 2012. EFTA00624845 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplemental Response