Epstein Secrets

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800SSSSMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / PROCEEDINGS HELD BEFORE JUDGE DONALD HAFELE Epstein's Motion for Fees and Costs HELD: Decembe

p?-4.* EFTA00617909 4 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 materials here from you and I've got the response in opposition filed by Mr. Edwards as well. MR. BREWER: As your Honor might remember, you entered a summary judgment THE COURT: Right. I remember the facts. I presume it's on appea

de it absolutely unethical _ ..pgam BEACH REPOR.T1NG SERVICE, INC. _561-471-2995 EFTA00617920 15 3 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 for Brad Edwards to have accepted this proposal for settlement. That requires an evidentiary basis, and I am prepared to give testimony with regard to that aspect.

te 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By: W. CHESTER BREWER, JR. LAW OFFICES OF TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th St. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 By: TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By: JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE ON BEHAL

a52 EFTA00598454 1 allegations, completely unsupported by any 2 evidence whatsoever, that he brought in the 3 various complaints filed against Bradley 4 Edwards as well. 5 I suggest that this is a very compelling, 6 both circumstantial and direct evidence case of 7 malice. We have more than satisfied th

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III individually, Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS DATE TAKEN: December 17, 2012 TIME: 11:02 PLACE: Palm Bea

your Honor are 15 overwhelmingly compelling circumstances from 16 which a jury could conclude that it was solely 17 as an effort to extort Mr. Edwards that claims 18 against him were filed. They were filed not 19 only in the total absence of probable cause, 20 they were filed in the absence of

8 APPEARANCES: On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein: TONJA HADDAD, 315 Southeast 7 Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954)467-1223 BY: TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQ. and ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, III. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 - One Clearlake Center West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561

good faith basis for my filing these claims against Mr. Edwards because there was this case filed down in Broward County that never even mentions Bradley Edwards' name. And he can't come and stand before Your Honor and say, as he just did through Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00788196

EFTA00788113 3 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: We have various motions on the Edwards counterclaim that was brought against Mr. Epstein relative to the remaining count of malicious prosecution. I have read as much as the materials

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 things until the Ponzi scheme gets uncovered and he seizes upon the Ponzi scheme as a means by which to try to extort Bradley Edwards into abandoning the legitimate interest of his clients or compromising those interests for less than those interests were worth. THE COURT: Let's

01 By W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A., ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 By TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By JACK A. GOL

VISION CASE NO.: 502009CA040800 AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTFIS LIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER ON COUNTER-PLAINTIFF EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' Mo

UNTER-PLAINTIFF EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' Motion to Amend to Add a Claim for Punitive Damages in regard to his abuse of process and malicious prosecution claims. The Court heard argument of

County, Florida. DAVID F. CROW CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Copy furnished: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409 TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE, 315 S. E. 7th St., Suite 301, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 FRED HADDAD, ESQUIRE, One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 JA

BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Appellee. FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4D14-2282 L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800

e litigation privilege applies to malicious prosecution claims, as well as its finding that the litigation privilege was applicable specifically to Edwards's claims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process against Epstein, constituted issues of law. DelMonico, 116 So. 3d at 1211 (stating the dete

FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4D14-2282 L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800 I ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE JEFFREY EPSTEIN TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQ. Florida Bar No.: 176737 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 467-1223 6 4 337-3716 facsimil

AL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS DATE TAKEN: Monday, January 27, 2014 TIME: 3:00 p.m. - 4:23 p.m. PLACE: Palm Bea

had no knowledge whatsoever 4 that a separate and independent action had been 5 brought by Mr. Epstein against the Rothstein 6 entities and Mr. Edwards. So to that extent, I 7 just to want let you know, as you probably already 8 did already know, that I handled those cases I 9 believe to their

DBERGER, ESQUIRE [email protected] 12 13 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street 14 Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 954.467.1223 BY: TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE [email protected] 16 17 On behalf of Bradley J. Edwards: 18 SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 19 2139 Palm Beach

ACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case Pa. 502009CAO40B00/COM 1 4 THE COURT: Announce your appearances for the Court, MR. SCAROLA: Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley Edwards, Your Honor. 3 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, MR. BREWER: Chester Brewer on behalf Plaintiff, of Jeffrey Epstein. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individbally, BRADLEY SWA

MR. SCAROLA: Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley Edwards, Your Honor. 3 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, MR. BREWER: Ch

E. 7th Street, Suite 301 14 And, obviously, our response to the 13 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 15 motion for sumnary judgment, as wall, which By TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE 16 Includes a variety of legal issues. 14 15 17 THE COURT: Can you be ready by 16 IS Tuesday, October 3rd? It sounds like it's 17

RECEIVED, 2/25/2015 3:10 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Appellee. / FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4D14-2282 L.T. Case No.: 502009CA04

e litigation privilege applies to malicious prosecution claims, as well as its finding that the litigation privilege was applicable specifically to Edwards's claims for malicious prosecution and abuse of process against Epstein, constituted issues of law. DelMonico, 116 So. 3d at 1211 (stating the dete

/ FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4D14-2282 L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800 ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE JEFFREY EPSTEIN TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQ. Florida Bar No.: 176737 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 467-1223 (954) 337-3716 (facsi

ry important distinction when Your Honor comes to ruling upon whether these lines of inquiry are relevant at all. Does it make any difference what Bradley Edwards' motive was, what his subjective thought processes were in filing a motion in the context of a pending case to require the posting of a bond if re

otion to overrule objections and compel Defendant/ Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' answer to questions. Judge, this motion is directed at Mr. Edwards' deposition testimony and the two depositions he provided in this case, the first of which was March 23rd, 2010, the second of which was May 15th,

01 By W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A., ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 315 S.E. 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 By TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By JACK A. GOL

t Lauderdale, FL 33301 ttorneys or e rey pstein Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHR

rclaim and Supporting Memorandum of Law, based on the law of the case doctrine. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In the Fourth Amended Counterclaim, Edwards raised two claims against Epstein: 1) abuse of process and 2) malicious prosecution. As to the malicious prosecution claim, Edwards alleged that th

/ FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4D14-2282 L.T. Case No.: 502009CA040800 ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEE JEFFREY EPSTEIN TONJA HADDAD COLEMAN, ESQ. Florida Bar No.: 176737 TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 JOHN BERANEK Fla. Bar No.: 0005419