Epstein Secrets

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees

ey Edwards whether he would withdraw them in exchange for an affidavit from Mr. Rush attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday, April 30, 2010, I received service of a subpoena from Doe's counsel requiring movant journalist George Rush to a

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

7300 Media Law Reporter Page 1 of Media Law Reporter® Source: Media Law Reporter Cases > U.S. District Courts, Tennessee > L.W. v. Knox County Board of Education, 36 Med.L.Rptr. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 36 Med.L.Rptr. 1721 L.W. v. Knox County Board of Education U.S. District Court Eastern District of Tennes

EY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against Defendants, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually. Accordingly, EPSTEIN states: SUMMARY OF ACTION Attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees

ey Edwards whether he would withdraw them in exchange for an affidavit from Mr. Rush attesting to the fact that he had interviewed Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards said he would not. 10. On Friday, April 30, 2010, I received service of a subpoena from Doe's counsel requiring movant journalist George Rush to a

etoric directed to cases against EPSTEIN used by Attorney EDWARDS and Berger changed dramatically in addressing th

2033 Media Law Reporter Page 1 of Media Law Reporter@ Source: Media Law Reporter Cases > U.S. District Courts, Tennessee > L.W. v. Knox County Board of Education, 36 Med.L.Rptr. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008) 36 Med.L.Rptr. 1721 L.W. v. Knox County Board of Education U.S. District Court Eastern District of Tennes

03/25/2009 RDC Conference with Pike and Bobbie re: subpoena and stays and Motion to Compel 0.60 hr $300.00 03/25/2009 RDC Receipt and review Edwards letter re: request client's name do not appear in court filing; BB - Re-Notice of Epstein's deposition, Notice of Production from 0.30 hr $150.00

, confer with R. Critton, Esq., regarding same, review Fla. Bar articles re: same 03/12/2009 BM Revisions to Subpoena to Employer and Subpoena to Board of Education; print prior Subpoenas for RDC to review, conference with RHB re: Motion to file; call to 1.40 hr $175.00 RHB re: Subpoena Confidentiality langua