Epstein Secrets

about October 13, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq. upon leaving a hearing in Bankruptcy Court

3. Service was never delivered to anyone at Mr. Epstein's vacation home in New York. (Id.). 4. On or about October 13, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq. upon leaving a hearing in Bankruptcy Court before the Honorable Raymond Ray, advised Christopher Knight, Esq., that Plaintiff M.J. had servic

Electronic Filing. s/Lillv Ann Sanchez Lill a Ann chez SERVICE LIST MJ. v. Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, PL Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Plaintiff M.J. Served via CM/ECF 5 FIOVANN WW2 BURN

r. Epstein's vacation home in New York. (Id.). 4. On or about October 13, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq. upon leaving a hearing in Bankruptcy Court before the Honorable Raymond Ray, advised Christopher Knight, Esq., that Plaintiff M.J. had service on Mr. Epstein at his building in New York_ That

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rwc 2 APPEARANCES: SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, by DAVID VITALE, Esquire On behalf of Bradley J. Edwards LINK & ROCKENBACH, by SCOTT LINK, Esquire and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein

K: Good morning, Judge. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. VITALE: Good morning, your Honor. David Vitale, V, as in Victor, i-t-a-l-e, on behalf of Mr. Edwards. MS. HENDERSON: Good morning, your Honor. Brittany Henderson on behalf of Farmer Jaffe Weissing. MR. CASSELL: Good morning, your Honor. This is P

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 18 Brad Edwards and his client, singular, that order was entered on L.M. and Brad Edwards' motion for relief of an amended order, which is on Docket Entry Number 1120. It was L.M. and Edwards who had sought the relief on which the order,

o --- THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Link. MR. PUGATCH: Okay. MR. LINK: You're welcome, your Honor. MR. PUGATCH: So, we come back to why we're here in Bankruptcy Court, Judge. We're here in Bankruptcy Court because they brought a petition for order to show cause why there should not be contempt and sanctions agai

CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards Date Services 06/01/18 TLC Work on scheduling

1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 930 Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USV 00802 CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards Date Services 06/01/18 TLC Work on scheduling J. Epstein's deposition; work on dates for same; multiple communications with client, C. Pugatch,

es of procedure re objecting to notice in preparation for drafting motion for protective order re B. Edwards' Notice of J. Epstein's Deposition in Bankruptcy Court 06/18/18 RJG Research elements of abuse of process cause of action to include in Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss 06/18/18 TLC Work

es Blvd. Suite 930 W • • • • 7 01 Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USV 00802 CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards Date Services 05/01/18 TLC Work on Motion to Compel B. Edwards to Identify Witnesses who will be called at trial to incorporate D. Indyke's sug

CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards Date Services 05/01/18 TLC Work on Motion to

prepare for and attend status conference hearing; follow up with J. Epstein and D. Indyke re same; review Court's Order following hearing; work on Bankruptcy Court strategies; work on Motion to Compel B. Edwards to identify Bates numbers of documents produced; work on Motion re filing certified copy of V. Rob

AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Bradley J. Edwards, through counsel, hereby files this Reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Je

ODUCTION Jeffrey Epstein's Motion, through one misstatement after another, amounts to nothing more than his continued baseless disparagement of Mr. Edwards, and a poor attempt to deflect from his wrongdoing and avoid the pertinent issues. [DE 6351]. In 2010, a subpoena was issued to the RRA trustee tha

ssue to whether privilege was properly invoked in the creation of the privilege log over seven years ago. That is certainly not an issue before the Bankruptcy Court. At this stage, the parties were about to start trial when Epstein mysteriously started listing as trial exhibits emails that are listed on the Febr

. Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, 83 St. Thomas, USV 00802 CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards Date Services 06/01/18 TLC Work on scheduling J. Epstein's deposition; work on dates for same; multiple communications with client, C. Pugatch,

CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards Date Services 06/01/18 TLC Work on scheduling

es of procedure re objecting to notice in preparation for drafting motion for protective order re B. Edwards' Notice of J. Epstein's Deposition in Bankruptcy Court 06/18/18 RJG Research elements of abuse of process cause of action to include in Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss 06/18/18 TLC Work

some important distinctions between Epstein and the Razorback Victims. First, Epstein's state court action against Rothstein and former RRA partner Bradley Edwards is further along. Epstein attempted to secure a deposition through his state court action, but the state court judge concluded he did not have the

against Rothstein and former RRA partner Bradley Edwards is further along. Epstein attempted to secure a

nding in federal and state courts. These parties previously had filed motions to depose Rothstein in the RRA bankruptcy proceeding, resulting in the Bankruptcy Court certifying its order to this Court for its approval, as Rothstein is currently serving a sentence imposed by this Court in Case No. 09.60331-CR. Be