Epstein Secrets

t the victims had been encouraged by the FBI or the Office to overstate their victimization for monetary compensation. • On July 3, 2008, attorney Edwards contacted me to discuss how the Epstein matter had been resolved and to raise concerns regarding that resolution. I shared the concerns that attorn

EFTA00799870 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 414 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 10 of 11 Respectfully Submitted, /5/ Sal, P. Eeitualua Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Telephon Facsimile E

n for monetary compensation. • On July 3, 2008, attorney Edwards contacted me to discuss how the Epstein matter ha

.1996); Tribune Co. v. Purcigliotti, 1997 WL 10924, *6 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 1997)). As an illustration of how the doctrine operates, this Court cited Volpe v. U.S. Ainvays, Inc., 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D.Fla.1998). As this Court explained, in Volpe, the plaintiff sued the defendant, alleging employment disc

PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND

, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTIONS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), submits this Memorandum of Law as to the Do

er way, it does not apply where there is no common interest to be promoted by a joint consultation and the parties meet on a purely adversary basis. Volpe v. Conroy Simberg, 720 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). A mere hope or expectation that the person 12 EFTA00805378 to whom privileged materials a

ssistant United States Attorney 9 EFTA00601690 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 10 of 11 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel: (954 524-2820• Fa

90 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 10 of 11 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel: (954 524-2820• Fax: 954 524-2822 E-mail: Paul G. C

plaintiff had the right to examine the investigation materials to determine if O'Quinn's reliance upon them was reasonable. Stern also relied upon Volpe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D. Fla. 1998), where the plaintiff sued defendant U.S. Airways for sexual harassment. U.S. Airways asserted

ssistant United States Attorney 9 EFTA00799972 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 10 of 11 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G. Cassell Pro H

72 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 10 of 11 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice S.J. Quinney College of La

plaintiff had the right to examine the investigation materials to determine if O'Quinn's reliance upon them was reasonable. Stern also relied upon Volpe v. U.S. Airways, Inc. 184 F.R.D. 672 (M.D. Fla. 1998), where the plaintiff sued defendant U.S. Airways for sexual harassment. U.S. Airways asserted

7, 8 Jan. 31, 2011) 12, 17 United States v. Delacruz, No. 14 Cr. 815 (KBF), 2015 WL 2211943, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2015) 16 United States v. Edwards, 101 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 1996) 13 United States v. Fares, 978 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1992) 30, 31, 33 United States v. Fernandez, 231 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir.

04 Cr. 424 (RWS), 2005 WL 927012, at *I (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2005) 10 United States v. Upton, 856 F. Supp. 727 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) 21 United States v. Volpe, 42 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) 24 United States v. Washington, 705 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1983) 14, 15 United States v. White, 972 F.2d 16 (2d

7, 8 Jan. 31, 2011) 12, 17 United States v. Delacruz, No. 14 Cr. 815 (KBF), 2015 WL 2211943, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2015) 16 United States v. Edwards, 101 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 1996) 13 United States v. Fares, 978 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1992) 30, 31, 33 United States v. Fernandez, 231 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir.

04 Cr. 424 (RWS), 2005 WL 927012, at ■1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2005) 10 United States v. Upton, 856 F. Supp. 727 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) 21 United States v. Volpe, 42 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) 24 United States v. Washington, 705 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1983) 14, 15 United States v. White, 972 F.2d 16 (2d