Epstein Secrets

ibit C, par. 12 specifically states: 12. On today's date, your Affiant provided the attached victim notifications to ■. and via their attorney, Bradley Edwards (Exs. 6 & 7). A notification was not provided to ■. because the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United

during the deem/lion such as it happens very 22 22nd of '09 the year, you specifically said when you 22 occasionally in depositions. Judge. Mr. Edwards or 23 were making a ruling in that case, I'm looking at the 23 Mr. Berger can say we're terminating the deposition and 24 statement from the FB

y information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. None of Attorney Edwards' clients had expressed a desire to be consulted

really want to be 9 there's only one case out there that deals with to interrupted, Mr. Berger, respectfully. 10 paparazzi and it involves the Onassis family, every 11 I just want to make sure I'm understanding who the 11 other case in Florida and every, and the rule is very 12 parties are and

Related Case No. 08- 80811 [email protected] Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las O

ard Miami, FL 33160 305.931.2200 For Jane Doe BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Bo

1, and cases cited therein. The case of Gaella v. Onassis, 487 F .2d 986, at 997 (2d Cir. 1973), cited by

ct Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley James Edwards [email protected] Isidro Manuel Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell

ed a party from a deposition in a variety of circumstances. Wright, Miller & Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2041 (1994) citing Galella v. Onassis, 487 F.2d 986 (2d Cir. 1973) (excluding party from attending deposition of opposing party where he had a pattern of unlawful harassment of opposing