Epstein Secrets

cum for Deposition, dated November 5, 2009, upon Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.; Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; Stuart Rosenfel

1 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 [email protected] Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax: 954-527-8663 bedwar

which were entered into by an investor relating to any plaintiff's case with Jeffrey Epstein and any of the following: a. Scott W. Rothstein b. Bradley J. Edwards C. RRA e. any entity formed by RRA or Bradley J. Edwards or Scott W. Rothstein to create investment opportunities for third party investors to inv

and proper. Rule 7 .1 A. 3. Certification of Pre-Filing Conference Counsel for Defendant in good faith conferred with Plaintiff's counsel, Bradley Edwards, by telephone and Mr. Edwards does not oppose the entry of an order. Counsel for Defendant wrote and enclosed copies of this motion and proposed ag

othstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., Coffey Burlington 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse, Miami, Florida 33133, and Paul Singerman, Esq., counsel for Herbert Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 405 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2009 Page 7 of 33 Jane Doe No.2 v. Epstein Case No. 08-CIV-801189 Epstein

d, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos &

0608067 Copies furnished: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman, Pt., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay How

made by RRA to or on behalf of any plaintiff 2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: a. Any Plaintiff and Bradley J. Edwards or any entity with which he was associated b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA 3. All documents reflecting the sale, purchase or investment by

me can I help you? I info1med her that I have a Subpoena for Herbert Stettin. She said one second let me call my husband on the phone. She spoke to Herbert from her mobile phone and informed him of the nature of my visit. She then informed me that I needed to serve Herbert personally and that she would

d, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos &

0608076 Copies furnished: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman, Pt., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay How

made by RRA to or on behalf of any plaintiff 2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: a. Any Plaintiff and Bradley J. Edwards or any entity with which he was associated b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA 3. All documents reflecting the sale, purchase or investment by

me can I help you? I info1med her that I have a Subpoena for Herbert Stettin. She said one second let me call my husband on the phone. She spoke to Herbert from her mobile phone and informed him of the nature of my visit. She then informed me that I needed to serve Herbert personally and that she would

0608085 Copies furnished: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman, Pt., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay How

made by RRA to or on behalf of any plaintiff 2. Any and all fee agreements that exist or have existed between the following: a. Any Plaintiff and Bradley J. Edwards or any entity with which he was associated b. Any Plaintiff and the law firm RRA 3. All documents reflecting the sale, purchase or investment by

d, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos &

me can I help you? I info1med her that I have a Subpoena for Herbert Stettin. She said one second let me call my husband on the phone. She spoke to Herbert from her mobile phone and informed him of the nature of my visit. She then informed me that I needed to serve Herbert personally and that she would

nce of NPA, which is later incorporated into state court record. 6/30/2008 Notes from calls to Michael Danchuk and Richard Willets, Jeff I lerman, Brad Edwards, Ted Leopold, and Mike Dutko B-55 6/30/2008 Research re State Work Release 6/30/2008 Draft notification of identified victims letters to Guy Lew

t _ 6/27/2008 Counsel for Epstein advise USAO of Epstein state court change of plea on 6/30/08 B ;1 6/27/2008 AUSA Villafana notifies Attorney Edwards of upcoming change of plea and urges his clients to attend 6/27/2008 USAO notifies Palm Beach Police Chief Reiter of upcoming change of plea. Ile

6/30/08 B ;1 6/27/2008 AUSA Villafana notifies Attorney Edwards of upcoming change of plea and urges his clients

y" 12/7/2007 Alan Dershwitz Herbert J. Stem Letter - 27 pages 12/7/2007 Kenneth Starr R. Alexander Acosta Independent ethics opinions of Judge Herbert). Stem and Joe D. Whitley regarding the federal investigation of this matter and the Section 2255 component of the Agreement. 12/7/2007 Lilly Ann

10 at 8:15 AM 04/07/2010 43 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Video of Michael Fisten & Richard Fandry 04/13/2010 44 Reqp Request to Produce To Edwards 04/13/2010 45 Mot Motion Pursuant to F.S. 57.105 04/15/2010 46 Noh Notice of Hearing 4-19-10 at 8:45 AM 04/15/2010 47 Mfpo Motion For Prote

rd Order On Dft Bradley J Edwards Motion to Compel or Alternatively to Strike Pltf Claim For Damages Dcrow 11/04/2010 139 Ord Order On Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Compel Complete Response to Reouest to Produce Dcrow 11/08/2010 140 Not Notice Of Propounding First Set of Expert Witness Interrogs And

Complaint 08/19/2009 97 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Of EW C/O Brad Edwards Esq. 08/19/2009 98 Notd Notice of Taking Deposition Of LM C/O Brad Edwards Esq. 08/20/2009 99 Npnp Notice of Production Non Party None 08/20/2009 100 Nnac Notice -Name/Address Change None 08/24/2009 101 Ord Order On Mot

all 1.866.540.8818. Florida Circuit & County Courts FL Circuit & County - Palm Beach (Palm Beach) 501991CA010544XXCDAH Epstein, Jeffrey'. Glass, Herbert I The case was last updated by the court on Monday, December 04 2006 Header Case Number: 501991CA010544XXCDAH Date Filed: 09/11/1991 Date Full C

e Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim

016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell.28 (Ex. 5 at 1).29 At

United States v. Henderson, 337 F.3d 914 (7th Cir. 2003) 61, 62 United States v. Henry, 861 F. Supp. 1190 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) 269 United States v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1983) 293 United States v. Hernandez, 85 F.3d 1023 (2d Cir. 1996) 242 United States v. Hester, No. 19 Cr. 324 (NSR), 2

ee Ex. 4 at 1).22 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwe

United States v. Henderson, 337 F.3d 914 (7th Cir. 2003) 61, 62 United States v. Henry, 861 F. Supp. 1190 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) 269 United States v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1983) 293 United States v. Hernandez, 85 F.3d 1023 (2d Cir. 1996) 242 United States v. Hester, No. 19 Cr. 324 (NSR), 2

ee Ex. 4 at 1).22 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwe

United States v. Henderson, 337 F.3d 914 (7th Cir. 2003) 61, 62 United States v. Henry, 861 F. Supp. 1190 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) 269 United States v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1983) 293 United States v. Hernandez, 85 F.3d 1023 (2d Cir. 1996) 242 United States v. Hester, No. 19 Cr. 324 (NSR), 2

1) Doe No. 1. v. United States, 32, 104 33 86 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 117, 118, 119 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 52 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No 00 Civ. 2290 (RIS), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 155 Falter v. United States, 23 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1928) 34 Falter,

ee Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

94 United States v. Henderson, 337 F.3d 914 (7th Cir. 2003) 43 United States v. Henry, 861 F. Supp. 1190 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) 177 United States v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1983) 200 United States v. Hernandez, 85 F.3d 1023 (2d Cir. 1996) 159 United States v. Heyward, No. 10 Cr. 84 (LTS), 2