Epstein Secrets

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the di

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE 11Q FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; prote

d not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION protected by privacy rights 06118-06146 09/15/2009 Seth Lehrman Bradley Edwards Farnsworth v. Marys case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evid

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to th

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P;

d not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE LQ FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION protected by privacy rights 06118-06146 09/15/2009 Seth Lehrman Bradley Edwards Farnsworth v. Macys case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evid

rding Alan Dershowitz, either by producing the information or compiling a proper privilege log. DATED: July xxx, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, 9 EFTA00210996 EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale,

xx, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, 9

07) (internal quotations omitted). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are broadly written and "strongly favor full discovery whenever possible." Farnsworth I Procter and Gamble Co., 758 F.2d 1545, 1547 (11th Cir.1985). Thus, as this Court has previously ruled in this case, the bottom line is that "[d]is