Epstein Secrets

, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) ) ) Petitioner/Counter-Defendant, ) ) vs. No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG ) SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, ) and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ) individually, ) ) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ) ) West Palm Beach, Florida November 2nd, 2018 10:25 a.m. - 1:06 p.m. Plaintiff/Counte

ss the proposed additional exhibits. The witness that was the potential cause of concern has been withdrawn for the purposes of the action by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein, so that is moot at this juncture. And we'll launch into the discussion relative to the proposed exhibits. I don't know if --

o you want to also be involved and set it up some other time? Bradley Edwards." MR. SCAROLA: Right. And the suggestion is made that this impeaches Brad Edwards' testimony that he only met with Mr. Rothstein and spoke about the Epstein cases on two occasions. Well, first of all, it doesn't do that. Palm B

al, whether it's admissible or not, whether it's really relevant or not, based upon the allegations included within the original complaint against Brad Edwards and the malicious prosecution claim that is currently being prosecuted in front of this Court. There is no way to excuse this nondisclosure, eith

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 communication subheading, there are -- there's a, for example, Wackenhut incident report for number 2 -- 332 and 334, and then an affidavit of Ken Jenne, the former sheriff of Broward County also listed. But, the bulk,

Doe: 6 15 16 17 18 19 20 KAI/691M W EZELL, ESQUIRE PODHURST ORSEOC 21 25 Wen Hagler Street SAC 800 22 Moe: 23 (Via one) 24 25 9 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS 10 FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 Rath Anikens Avenue 11 Stile 2 1 2 Fat 33301 Maw 13 On behalf ac

QUIRE PODHURST ORSEOC 21 25 Wen Hagler Street SAC 800 22 Moe: 23 (Via one) 24 25 9 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS 10 FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 Rath Anikens Avenue 11 Stile 2 1 2 Fat 33301 Maw 13 On behalf ace a I Drench 8. 14 JESSICA ARDOUR. ESQUI

THE WITNESS: I have no idea. BY MR. KUVIN: Q. Okay. Do you know whether or not Mr. Epstein Ina a security company now working at his house called Wackenhut? A. Yes. Q. Do you know when they were retained? A Shortly, shortly after. his release from the county jail. Q. Okay.. A Or just prior to his r

, sir. 18 him? 19 Q. Any local reporters from the media here? 19 A. Again, I received a phone call from 20 A. Not that I'm aware of. 20 Mr. Edwards pertaining to a victim that was not in the 21 Q. TV broadcasters looking for news about 21 original report I referred him over to the FBI. 22 M

ors connected to this case on any 12 A. No. 12 occasion? 13 Q. New York Post? 13 A. No, sir. I was under the assumption that 14 A. No. 14 Wackenhut was still protecting the property. 15 Q. New York Tunes? 15 Q. After Mr. Epstein entered his plea and began 16 A. (Non-verbal response). 16 h