Epstein Secrets

y Jane Doe. Responses due by 4/27/2009 (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 04/09/2009) 04/09/2009 34 NOTICE of Change of Address and Firm Affiliation by Bradley James Edwards [See Image at DE #30] (Is) (Entered: 04/13/2009) 04/13/2009 33 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer re 30 Notice (Other) f

dant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint MOTION for More Definite Statement MOTION to Strike i Complaint filed by Jane Doe. Replies due by 10/27/2008. (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 10/16/2008) 10/27/2008 18 r a Complaint REPLY to Response to Motion re 16 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint MOTION

a, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard ach, FL 33409 Counsel for Plaintiff, Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort 3301 Phon Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 808

56 https://ectilsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.p17859999798355213-L_801_0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA00175427 I. (\iced a gOetA) rfuCate rmr9 e. or- r:le, [Nader ,E35 IvA.5 N155; in Awl° Co r r Ire° , Pile-s. EFTA00175428 Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 19

plaintiff/counter-defendant below, challenges the circuit court's Order entered March 8, 2018' by the Honorable Donald Hafele, granting Respondent Bradley J. Edwards' Motion for Separate Trials.'' By separate motion, Petitioner moves to consolidate this petition with his pending Emergency Petition for Writ of Man

admittedly running a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme by convincing investors he had negotiated multi-million settlements in high-profile cases. Three of Edwards' clients at the time alleged tort claims against Epstein, which Epstein ultimately settled. Based on publicly available information about 3 All bac

gs that cannot be corrected on appeal (sometimes referred to as irreparable harm); and (2) a departure from the essential requirements of the law." Nader v. Fla. Dep't of Highway Safety & 7 Epstein simultaneously filed his Motion for Default Against Defendant Rothstein on the Second Amended Complaint

e Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim

016, AUSA- I met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regardingJeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for= who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell.28 (Ex. 5 at 1).29 At

es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmad, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 1

ee Ex. 4 at 1).22 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwe

es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmed, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 13

ee Ex. 4 at 1).22 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwe

es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmed, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 13

1) Doe No. 1. v. United States, 32, 104 33 86 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 117, 118, 119 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 52 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No 00 Civ. 2290 (RIS), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 155 Falter v. United States, 23 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1928) 34 Falter,

ee Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who had al

es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 40 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 35 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 35 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Alzmad, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 112 United States v. Ahmed, 10 Cr. 131 (

ee Ex. 4 at 1).27 AUSA-1 agreed to the meeting, and on or about February 29, 2016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for who had alleged that she is a victim

016, AUSA-1 met with three attorneys—Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger— regarding Jeffrey Epstein. (See Ex. 4 at 1). Edwards and Pottinger were also attorneys for who had alleged that she is a victim of sex crimes perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell.28 (Ex. 5 at I).29 At t

es, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) 56 Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2004) 47 Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (1970) 48 United State v. Nader, 425 F. Supp. 3d 619 (E.D. Va. 2019) passim United States v. Ahmed, 992 F. Supp. 682 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) 166 United States v. Ahmed, No. 10 Cr. 1

London e . 0207-622 & 8738 (11) EFTA00191487 Edwards, Andrew & Tfti 9 ~ H uth 0 07-2354121 (h) p

) Palumbo, Mr James Flat runbar 5 78 Ons heclohleg149,, 28 8 Oiteliew) 020,-244L, (h) Palumbo, Peter 2 Aston rat hee.).{.51127, Panah-Izadi, Nader & Brigitte 241 Boulevard St. Germain Pa Th ns 5 e Balkan London SW10 0 7-244 6362.14 0 33 1 4550 3511 (ph) Pank, Ms JIM & Alby Cart 22 l

. of California, Davis University of Washington (Edwards Lecture) SouthWest Psychology Conf, London Gold

ote) The California Club, Los Angeles Northwestern Law School, Chicago The Amazing Meeting (TAM), Las Vegas, NV Foundation for Critical Thinking (Nader event), Berkeley, Ca Federal Court Clerk Assn, Seattle, WA Trauma & Memory, Stockholm, Sweden What Matters To Me, and Why (UC-Irvine) Universit

odge workshop, 6 p.m. Wednes- day, town hall. 247 Edwards Lane. Palm Springs Leisure Services Board, 7 p.

l Inc aril Warne re Vie Dr er elearce corral.? s n rea Ho aired in INK east a long: ,•• meteor Cl Coln me Par Mae COUNT/ BuiCti and 20n r0 Iked Nader, rd Coot k:.,ic.ty 5)1'0. Doi was a pall Greet, Orin c•nnoa n ay. Coat? Croat of une Na»a E!ett..CO Corr.:cleft NKOMO, He wit me-00. cf to Weil