Epstein Secrets

its-Ant; Class Code: LIU Closed: No Statute: no Jury Demand: None Demand Amount: S$0 NOS Description: Civil Rights: Other Attorneys Jane Doe Bradley James Edwards Petitioner Lead Attorney Farmer Jaffe WeIssin • Edwards Fstos & Lehrman Pl. United States of Amer ca Respondent Jay C. Howell la Howell & Asso

Y to 29 Response in Opposition to Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement flied by Jane Doe. Attachments: 9 1 Exhibit October 9, 2008 letter from Brad Edwards, Esquire to AUSA >Y 2 Exhibit October 15, 2008 Letter from Brad Edwards, Esquire to AUSA (Entered: 10/16/2008) 10/08/2008 29 RESPONSE In Opposi

9/W2010. (tb) (Entet: 09/123/2010 0443413010) NOTIS! by Sone Dos 40eniehtrative Order In Respxsa to AdmIrestratse Ords Oceirci Case 39 22/13/2410 (Edwards, 51110N) (Enter« 09/13/2010) ORDER TO SHOW CM.« br lick ef peceOppion. Rico amle Rapar« due by 10/27/2010. Slutta 22±121" 14 by Mg. Kn A. mrel on

re serve jail time. register as a sex offender and pay he victim reellheon than risk a trial with a reduced likelihood of success: Waal' attorneys Bred Edwards arid Pal Cassel are seeing lo get me non-prosecution agreement overturned. saying the U.S. Attorney's Oros violated the Crime Victims' Rghts Act by

00230205 • -i trfccAr<A,-- — ''1 LexisNexis CotztLink - Rocket Number Scarch Result Page 3 of 4 n ceb. 15 o 16 • n opne 17 Rormø ta= Renner • 1 dosis snes) (u). (Vitna ONN/1~ 07/17/2000 TRANSCIUO or ~rin; hald on 7/11/2005 beror* /tilsi Kenneth A. Moro Court INNter: INtotie 9hTM na!~

erve Mil time. register as a sex offender and pay Ms victims reetitaion than risk a trial with a reduced likelihood of success' Victims' attorneys Brad Edwards and Pail Cassel are seeing to gel the non-prosecution agreement overturned. saying the U.S. Attorney's Oros violated the Crime Victims' Rghts Act b

ler:C6 Respondent Class Code: LIU Closed: No Statute: no Jury Demand: None Demand Amount: $$0 NOS Description: Chill Rights: Other Attorneys Bradley James Edwards Lead Attorney Farmer Jaffe Welssino Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL Jay C. Howell Jay Howell & Associates PA Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorney

ff's MOTION Motion to Use Correspondence to Prove Violations of the C me Victims' Right Act an to Have Their Unredacted Pleadings Unsealed by i (Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 03/21/2011) 03/21/2011 50 Plaintiffs MOTION Motion for Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant E

Arnrinca. : (Eared' 04/08/2011) _ , Runne — 04/04/2011 ~1 ENTRY • Docket Entry 63 rettn~Sealed ma Mather notice (4) (Entreat 04041/2011) . Renner 01/06/2011 SYSTEm ENOS - Docket entry 64 reacterMaied at rats ~o. Id» (entered: WOG/2011) MOTIONS Ea1aMl0e Silo Fee es to 48 Moats POTION ar SUMM

occurs in the United States." Burnett II, 292 F.Supp2d at 19 n. 4 (quoting Tel-Oven v. Libyan Arab Republic, 726 F.24 774, 775 (D.C.Cir.1984)) (Edwards, J., concurring) (some emphasis omitted). Courts in the Second Circuit seem to take the opposite approach. "Although cast in terms that may be re

e or identify any duty owed to Plaintiffs). Banks do not owe non-custom- ers a duty to protect them from the inten- tional torts of their customers. Renner v. Chase Manhattan Bank, No. 98 Civ. 926(CSH), 1999 WL 47239, at *Is (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 1999) (citing cases); Burnett 1, 274 F.Supp.2d at 109 ("