Epstein Secrets

D MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") and states as follows:' SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Edwards' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgmen

OTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to De

4th DCA 2004). By the same token, conclusory allegations in an affidavit do not raise issues of facts and should be stricken. See, e.g., Reinke v. O'Connell, 790 F. 2d 850, 851-52 (11th Cir. 1986). Finally, summary judgment should not be granted until all discovery has been completed. See, e.g., Sica v.

TRUE 680, LLC KING,GIOCONDA ST EDWARDS RECTORY BELL JR,LOWRY M 375 SOUTH C

BUFFETT,JAMES MYERS,STEPHEN E OCONNELL,LINDA P HIMMEL,WILLIAM J DENNIS,MIC

occurs in the United States." Burnett II, 292 F.Supp2d at 19 n. 4 (quoting Tel-Oven v. Libyan Arab Republic, 726 F.24 774, 775 (D.C.Cir.1984)) (Edwards, J., concurring) (some emphasis omitted). Courts in the Second Circuit seem to take the opposite approach. "Although cast in terms that may be re

349 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES function of "financing . . . investments in productive projects of a commercial na- ture"). NCB also urges that O'Connell Machin- ery Ca v. M.V. "Americana," 734 F.2d 115 (2d Cir.1984), mandates the finding that the PIF is a political subdivision of the Kingdom. In O'