Epstein Secrets

espectfully submits this Consolidated Reply in Opposition to Defendant's Letters, Construed as Motions to Disqualify Professor Paul Cassell and Mr. Edwards from Representing Ms. For the reasons set forth below, this Court should deny both of Defendant's Letter Motions, and grant Professor Cassell and

Vice) S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 (801) 858-5202 [email protected] Bradley J. Edwards (Seeking Pro Hac Vice) FARMER, JAFFE,WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, ■. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 5

essor Cassell has developed a specialized expertise in crime victims' rights, an area in which he has co-written a leading law school casebook. See Beloof, Cassell & Twist, Victims in Criminal Procedure (3d ed. North Carolina Academic Press 2010). He has also litigated crime victims' rights matters before federal cour

RGES ARE FILED Winter, 2014 Reporter 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59 * Length: 23898 words Author: PAUL G. CASSELL*, NATHANAEL J. MITCHELL** and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS*** * Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law, S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah. ** Associate, Snow, Christensen &

CASSELL*, NATHANAEL J. MITCHELL** and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS*** * Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Cr

ctims in Criminal Procedure 3-39 (3d ed. 2010) (describing reforms from a historical perspective); see also, e.g., /8 U.S.C. § 377/(a) (2012). 7 See Beloof, Cassell & Twist, supra note 6, at 3-39 (describing the history of victims’ rights in American law and the early days of the modern movement). 8 See, e.g., William F

l). 40 Does v. United States, 817 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (S.D. Fla. 2011). In the interest of full disclosure, two of the authors of this Article (Cassell and Edwards) are co-counsel for the victims in this case. The statement of the facts in this Article draws heavily on the victims' allegations as they have detai

tion Paul G. Cassell, Nathanael J. Mitchell, and Bradley J. Edwards, Crime Victims’ Rights During Criminal Investigati

CTIMS IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3-39 (3d ed. 2010) (describing reforms from a historical perspective), see also, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a) (2012). T See BELOOF, CASSELL & TWIST, supra note 6, at 3-39 (describing the history of victims’ rights in American law and the early days of the modern movement). 8 See, e.g., William F