Epstein Secrets

nowledge 6 of who this woman is. 7 SPECIAL MASTER POZZUOLI: I'm going to 8 grant the objection. Move on. Rephrase the 9 question. 10 BY MR. EDWARDS: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Q. This is not my deposition. 20 A. I understand that, but you're giving a 21 hypothetical and I'm giving

www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615766 646 January 14, 2016 COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 10111111111111 BY: THOMAS EMERSON SCOTT, JR., ESQ. Re: Bradley Edwards, et al., v. Alan M. Dershowitz Please take notice that on the 12th day of January, 2016, you gave your deposition in the above cause. At that time

talk about my client being presumed 14 innocent, my client being innocent. That's part of 15 the role of a criminal defense lawyer. Justice 16 Blackmun has said that the criminal defense lawyer's 17 role does not end in a courtroom, it continues to 18 the courthouse steps. 19 And so when my cli

: Thank you. 12:35:43 3 BY MR. SCAROLA: 12:35:43 4 Q. What do you contend, independent of 12:35:43 5 anything that may be in any pleadings, Bradley 6 Edwards and Paul Cassell are responsible for, 7 negligence, recklessness, or intentional and willful 8 fabrication of lies? 9 A. Let me answer that qu

p a non-prosecution agreement, they were 25 trying to do it for reasons that were improper. EFTA00601273 121 1 So, yes, I did -- you know, Mr. Edwards, 12:28:55 2 your client, is shaking his head, but when he's 3 deposed under oath, he's not going to be able to 4 simply shake his head. He's g

ading hoping to get judicial immunity, yes, at 4 that point the appropriate response is in the court 5 of public opinion. 6 That's what Justice Blackmun said in a 15:46:00 7 concurring opinion in the Supreme Court, that the 8 duty of a lawyer does not stop at the courtroom door 9 but it continu

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2009 Page 17 of 18 Respectfully Submitted, Plaintiff, by One of Her Counsel, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone

Senator Kerry refers to the statutorily imposed damage amount as "penalties." Id. The cases of U.S. v. Siegel, supra (11th Cir. 1998), and U.S. v. Edwards, supra (3d Cir. 1998), also support Defendant's position that application of the current version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 would be in clear violation of

statutory enactments is simply not present here, and the record is devoid of any factual material that would support such a conclusion.10 As Justice Blackmun said in dissent in Landsgraf, there is no vested right to break the law." Bottom line is, a motion to dismiss a claim is not the correct procedural