Epstein Secrets

tes District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehr

Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 E-mail: brad@pathtoj

V-MARRAMOHNSON EFTA00208059 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04107/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to

tes District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehr

Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fax: E-mail: Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of L

s been filed." 23 EFTA00078857 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to

of the June 12, 2009 hearing on Mr. Epstein's renewed motion to stay the civil cases pending in front of federal Judge Marra, Jane Doe's attorney, Brad Edwards, also counsel for respondent E.W., advised Judge Marra that he had filed the non-prosecution agreement "under seal in your court" in "Jane Doe 1 an

eement "under seal in your court" in "Jane Doe 1 and 2 vs. United States of America" (EWA at 5). Mr. Epstein's counsel advised Judge Colbath of Mr. Edwards' sealed filing in federal court at the June 25, 2009 hearing: "June 12th, Mr. Edwards advised Judge Marra that he had, in fact, filed a nonprosecut

ted States v. John Doe Inc. I, 481 U.S. 102, 109 n.5 (1987); United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983); Lance v. United States Dep't of Justice (In re Grand Jury Investigation), 610 F.2d 202, 213 (5th Cir. 1980). A ruling unsealing the non-prosecution agreement and addendum would not disclo

vania and New York relied heavily on private prosecutors for criminal law enforcement before 1850. See Stewart v. Sonneborn, 98 U.S. 187, 198 (1879) (Bradley, J., dissenting) ("Every man in the community, if he has probable cause for prosecuting another, has a perfect right, by law, to institute such prose

ed States, 817 F. Supp. 2d 1337, 1342-45 (SD. Fla. 2011) (recognizing that 1/8 U.S.C. § 3771(a) can apply before formal charges are filed); Jordan v. Dep't of Justice, 173 F. Supp. 3d 44, 52 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (citing In re Dean, 527 F.3d at 395); United States v. BP Prod. N. Am., Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008 WL 501321, a