Epstein Secrets

Expedite Delivery JACK SCAROLA JS/mep Enc. ce: Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. Christopher Knight, Esq.

pstein Case Anthony P RRA CLIENT Attorneys at RRA Barry Stone Attorney RRA Bert Patton Legal Assistant to Robert Josefsberg Beth Williamson Paralegal RRA Bradley Edwards Attorney RRA Cara Holmes Attorney RRA Carl Linder Attorney RRA Carla Martinez Law Clerk at RRA Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel) Caroly

ton Legal Assistant to Robert Josefsberg Beth Williamson Paralegal RRA Bradley Edwards Attorney RRA Cara Holmes Attorney RRA Carl Linder Attorney RRA Carla Martinez Law Clerk at RRA Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel) Carolyn Edwards (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co-Counsel) Confidential Source Christin

se) Attorney RRA | Scott Goldstein Attorney RRA Scott Rothstein Attorney RRA Seth Lehrman Attorney RRA Shawn Gilbert Prior Legal Assistant to Brad Edwards Sid Garcia Counsel for other Epstein Victims Counsel for other Epstein Victims Attorney RRA Counsel for other Epstein Victims Steven Jaffe Stuart

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the di

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE 11Q FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; prote

d not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

n BATES PATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 08157-08159 06/03/2009 Carla Martinez Bradley Edwards Vanity Fair Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to th

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P;

d not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

n BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 08157-08159 06/03/2009 Carla Martinez Bradley Edwards Vanity Fair Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the