Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00205661

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

NE DOE 2, 1. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING BY LIMITED INTERVENORS BLACK, WEINBERG, LEFKOWITZ, AND EPSTEIN The limited intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowtiz, and Epstein re-file this reply, which is identical to the reply that was previousl

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING BY LIMITED INTERVENORS BLACK, WEINBERG, LEFKOWITZ, AND EPSTEIN The limited intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowtiz, and Epstein re-file this reply, which is identical to the reply that was previously filed during the litigation on intervention. We only add that,

which he adhered and has fully performed. These are the unique facts that underlie the claims of work-product and common-law privilege of attorneys Black, Weinberg & Lefkowitz as it pertains to the plea discussions in this case. For good reason, the Rules require that the Court consider each claim of privilege on a case-by

EFTA00205219

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

EK EXTENSION OF TIME To FILE ADDITIONAL BRIEFING Following the hearing on August 12, 2011, the Court gave proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz until Friday, August 26 to file supplemental briefing on the issues raised concerning plea negotiations with Jeffrey Epstein. Also following the hea

Accordingly, we respectfully request an extension of time until Friday, September 2, 2011, to file the supplemental briefing of proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg & Lefkowitz, and to file a motion for limited intervention to assert rights under Rules of Evidence 408 and 410. We certify that on August 22, 2011, the forego

EFTA00205987

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page