Epstein Secrets

From: " (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN= To: "Jay Lefkowitz" c Cc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" < . (USAFLS)" Subject: Epstein Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:40:35 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 071015_Speci

AFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN= To: "Jay Lefkowitz" c Cc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" < . (USAFLS)" Su

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the

e know. I will go over the other issues you raise in your email and will look forward to speaking tomorrow. Thanks — Jay 10/22/2007 04:40 PM To "Jay Lefkowitz" cc "Acosta, Alex USAFLS " u jec Epstein EFTA00214909 Jay, The Judge Davis issue is a non-starter. We've beaten that horse to death. Regardin

row. Thanks — Jay 10/22/2007 04:40 PM To "Jay Lefkowitz" cc "Acosta, Alex USAFLS " u jec Epstein EFT

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Stornan,Jeff(USAFLS) 411, mt Monday.Cctober22.20074:41 PM I: Jay Lefkowitz Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Attachments: 071015 Special Master Letter3.wpd; Addendum.wpd Jay, Th

) 411, mt Monday.Cctober22.20074:41 PM I: Jay Lefkowitz Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Villafana, Ann Marie

initially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be ir: • ectly at odds with the purpose of

From: Jay Lefkowitz (mailto:[email protected]) Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:05 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Re: • ff - I have reviewed your prop

From: Jay Lefkowitz (mailto:JLefkowitz@kirkland.com) Sent: Friday, O

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the

o. Therefore, please advise me whether we have a deal no later than COB tomorrow, Tuesday, October 23, 2007. Thanks, • ----Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz (mailto: Sent: Frida , October 19, 2007 4:05 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: - I have reviewed your proposed language and wanted to raise a few are

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the

will go over the other issues you raise in your email and will look forward to speaking tomorrow. Thanks — Jay (USAFLS)" 10/22/2007 04:40 PM To "Jay Lefkowitz" < cc "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) < >, (USAFLS)" > Subject Epstein Jay, The Judge Davis issue is a non-starter. We've beaten that horse to death.

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the