Epstein Secrets

this Court to allow them five extra pages beyond the twenty-page limit to respond to the Supplemental Briefing in Support of Motion to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz (DE 94) and the government response thereto (DE 100). The motion is unopposed. In support of the motion, the vi

TATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FIVE EXTRA PAGES TO RESPOND TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE BY ROY BLACK ET AL. COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move this Court to allow them fiv

previously received from Epstein in their civil case in their CVRA case. DE 51. On April 7, 2011, Epstein's criminal defense attorneys — appellants Roy Black and Martin Weinberg — filed a motion for limited intervention in the case, arguing that their right to confidentiality in the correspondence would b

926, 13-12928 IN THE Einiteb ibtateo Court of appeato FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees Defendant-Appellee Intervenors-Appellants OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR STAY OF DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY ORDER PENDING APPEAL

51. 6 EFTA00209578 Procedural History Regarding Releasing the Correspondence On April 7, 2011, Epstein's criminal defense attorneys — appellants Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz — filed a motion for limited intervention in the case, arguing that their right to confidentiality in the corre

No. 13-12923 IN THE Iluiteb Mateo Court of appeato FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. I AND JANE DOE NO. 2, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees Defendant-Appellee Intervenors-Appellants MOTION TO DISMISS NON-PARTY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JA