Epstein Secrets

wler White Burnett PA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The foregoing document was served on May 17, 2011, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Es Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 8 EFTA00205018 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 [email protected] (via U.S. mail) 9

judication of the rights of the original parties."). A district court's ruling on such intervention is reviewed only for abuse of discretion. Stone. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 2004) see also AT&T Corp. I. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560, 561-62 (2nd Cir. 2005) ("[a] denial of permissive intervention h

going document was served on May 16, 2011, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: ssistant U.S. Attorneys Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. Boulevaitl, Suite 1300 7 EFTA00795280 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 81

dication of the rights of the original parties."). A district court's ruling on such intervention is reviewed only for abuse of discretion. Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 2004) see also AT&T Corp. v. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560, 561-62 (2nd Cir. 2005) ("[a] denial of permissive intervention h

remedy that would harm him," Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlocutory Appeal (filed by plaintiffs in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, Roy Black, et at, Intervenors, Eleventh Circuit No. 13-12923, citing Doc.108 at 13 n.3 (Mr. Epstein's assertion that he has an interest in the non-prosecution

uit has said that "Where is a presumption of adequate representation where an existing party seeks the same objectives as the interveners," Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305, 1311 (11th Cir. 2004), that presumption is a "weak" one, id.;"[i]nterveners need only show that the current [party's) representatio

remedy that would harm him," Motion to Dismiss Non-Party Interlocutory Appeal (filed by plaintiffs in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, Roy Black, et al., Intervenors, Eleventh Circuit No. 13-12923, citing Doc.108 at 13 n.3 (Mr. Epstein's assertion that he has an interest in the non-prosecutio

t has said that "[t]here is a presumption of adequate representation where an existing party seeks the same objectives as the interveners," Stone v. First Union Corp., 371 F.3d 1305, 1311 (11th Cir. 2004), that presumption is a "weak" one, id.;"[i]nterveners need only show that the current [party's] representatio