Epstein Secrets

ed: 04/25/2014 Page: 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-12923-CC JANE DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, Defendant - Appellee. Intervenors - Appellants. On Appeal from the United S

- Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida BEFORE: PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. BY THE COURT: Appellants' Mme Sensitive Motion for a Stay Pending a Ruling on Intervenors' Petition for Rehearing" is DENIED. *

trict court to compel the United States to produce all requested discovery about the plea negotiations. Epstein and his criminal defense attorneys, Roy Black and Martin Weinberg, moved to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the disclosure and use of the correspondence they wrote during plea

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

trict court to compel the United States to produce all requested discovery about the plea negotiations. Epstein and his criminal defense attorneys, Roy Black and Martin Weinberg, moved to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the disclosure and use of the correspondence they wrote during plea

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

trict court to compel the United States to produce all requested discovery about the plea negotiations. Epstein and his criminal defense attorneys, Roy Black and Martin Weinberg, moved to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the disclosure and use of the correspondence they wrote during plea

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

trict court to compel the United States to produce all requested discovery about the plea negotiations. Epstein and his criminal defense attorneys, Roy Black and Martin Weinberg, moved to intervene for the limited purpose of challenging the disclosure and use of the correspondence they wrote during plea

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees, 1. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Roy Black, Martin G. Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, Intervenors-Appellants. No. 13-12923. April 18, 2014. Background: Alleged minor victims of federal sex crime

nited States District Court for the Southern District of Flor- ida. D.C. Docket No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM. Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,FN* District Judge. FN* Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designati

ed: 04/25/2014 Page: 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-12923-CC JANE DOE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, Defendant - Appellee. Intervenors - Appellants. On Appeal from the United S

- Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida BEFORE: PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. BY THE COURT: Appellants' Mme Sensitive Motion for a Stay Pending a Ruling on Intervenors' Petition for Rehearing" is DENIED. *