Epstein Secrets

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arb

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:44:07 +0000 Privileged and Confidential inbox x Gr Darren Indyke 11:33 AM (56 minutes ago) to me Please

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

From: Mike Sitrick To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Follow up Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:06:16 +0000 Jeffrey I am in the midst of another client p

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

From: Mike Sitrick < Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:31 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Sure From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tu

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:22 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Jeffrey I have had some time to check the facts. Your informati

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was t=e source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell=you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 4:02 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: Follow up not at all i sent an email to you on thurs, i resend Michael, Thanks for your time yesterday . to hopefully w=rk toward

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in June 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was the source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. I tell you this in the spirit of resoution, my understandi

From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:43 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Off now From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: T

an arbitration demand in March 2012, in J=ne 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was t=e source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arb

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:44 PM To: Mike Sitrick Inbox <=iv class="" style> <https://ssIgstatic.com/ui/v1ficons/mail/profile_maskix.pn=> <=div> Darren Indyke 11:33 AM (56 minutes ago) <https: