Epstein Secrets

rom my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Sent: Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM TO: ns ne Cc: Ainbanklaw [nfo; i! Denyse Sabagh; _ Michael Baxter; ; Patrick M. Regan; i! Robert Barnett; Weingarten, Reid; SS ; ES ; (OR ne -ilen Kerns; ee Subject: Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell We know of course that

e. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it

Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no? |

herwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit strange consi

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Sent: Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM To: Cc: Ainbanklaw Info; Denyse Sabagh; | Michael Baxter; Re, Patrick M. Regan; Robert Barnett; Weingarten, Reid; Ellen Kerns; Subject: Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell We know of course that Saturdays are reserved

e. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it

Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no? |

herwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit strange consi

umber? Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Sent: Saturday, July 1, 2017 12:49 PM To: Cc: Ainbanklaw Info; Denyse Sabagh; Michael Baxter; Patrick M. Regan; - Robert Barnett; Weingarten, Reid; Ellen Kerns; Subject: Re: The new iterations of Ghislaine Maxwell We know of course that Saturdays are reserv

e. * * Jeffrey Epstein in context: (As sent to the Wash Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it

Post) | send you this in response to the recent column entitled Believe in the Process by Kenneth Starr. Perhaps rethink any public affiliation with Ken Starr; although his demeanor on paper is undoubtably consoling, it is also a bit intoxifying when it would be best now if we keep our wits about us, no? |

herwise what many consider the murder of Vince Foster (Foster, albeit the subject of a different investigation was also under the purview of attorney Starr and formal investigation of the results of Starr's investigation were drowned out by the details of the Lewinsky affair.) This is a bit strange consi