6
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
12 / 6
Mentions
e in sexual activity or prostitution 2422(b) EPSTEIN caused M. to place one or more traveled via During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were
ng a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Ro
ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical worth used in different parts of the same act are in
ng a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Ro
ions, which will be named as co-conspirators and as aiders and abettors in the relevant offenses. 2F During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were
ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical worth used in different parts of the same act are in
connected and the videotapes were gone. Nonetheless, the search did recover some evidence of value, 'During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were
Page: EFTA02857524_p2 →ng a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Ro
Page: EFTA02857524_p2 →her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are int
Page: EFTA02857524_p8 →ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in
Page: EFTA02857732_p5 →uring the 18 month period that she was in contact with him. OTHER ISSUES RAISED BY THE DEFENSE EFTA02857759 When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. from PBPD. Neith
Page: EFTA02857732_p29 →59 When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the lett
Page: EFTA02857732_p29 →ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in
Page: EFTA02857763_p5 →Beach home during the 18 month period that she was in contact with him. V. OTHER ISSUES RAISED BY THE DEFENSE When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. Joe Recarey from
Page: EFTA02857763_p45 →NSE When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the lett
Page: EFTA02857763_p45 →ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in
Page: EFTA02857810_p5 →ions, which will be named as co-conspirators and as aiders and abettors in the relevant offenses. 2F During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were
Page: EFTA02857810_p28 →ng a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Ro
Page: EFTA02857810_p28 →Entities connected to both Gerald Lefcourt and Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONAnn Sanchez
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Palm Beach Police Department
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Palm Beach County
LOCATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Barry Krischer
PERSON
Barry Diller
PERSON
Palm Beach
LOCATION
Jeffrey Sloman
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Lilly
ORGANIZATION
Sarah Kellen
PERSON