Epstein Secrets

Epstein would pay the girl—usually $200—and if it was a "new" girl, would ask for the girl's phone 'During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were

ng a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Ro

dibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s

] Sent: Wednesda Ma 23, 2007 5:00 PM To: Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein Thanks for the email. I will get back to you as to timing of the meeting. Gerald B. Lefcourt Gerald B. Lefcourt. P C 148 E. 78th Street New York New York 10021 Tel. Fax ?Mr" From: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) [mailto:Andrew.Lourtegusdoj.gov]

n your file. thx FW: Jeffrey psein From: Gerald Lefcourt [mailto:GBLglefcourtlaw.com] Sent: Wednesda Ma

ve they attempted to discredit her? A Yes. Q And is one of the bases for their attempt to discredit her the fact that she didn't appear before the State Grand Jury? A Yes. Q Are you aware of whether or not was ever subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury? A There was a subpoena issued to her.

connected and the videotapes were gone. Nonetheless, the search did recover some evidence of value, 'During a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Roy Black instructed Epstein to have the CPUs removed, but they insisted that those instructions were

ng a meeting, Epstein's current attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, admitted that attorney Ro

dibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#6 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s

edibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#9 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s

uring the 18 month period that she was in contact with him. OTHER ISSUES RAISED BY THE DEFENSE EFTA02857759 When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. from PBPD. Neith

59 When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the lett

edibility because of all of the sexual activity that she describes. One attack is that she is incredible because she was subpoenaed to appear before the State Grand Jury and never appeared. The defense neglects to point out that the subpoena was issued one or two days before JD#8 was to testify in West Palm Beach; s

Beach home during the 18 month period that she was in contact with him. V. OTHER ISSUES RAISED BY THE DEFENSE When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. Joe Recarey from

NSE When you review the cover letter from Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the lett