Epstein Secrets

behalf of such person) during the very• communication that constitutes the required basis for federal jurisdiction. EFTA00079412 LAW OF/PICCO OP GERALD B. LEFCOURT. P.C. FCre₹ o Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 25, 2007 Page 5 To our knowledge, the c

T TB" STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH riBlialloROWEWN:orn RENATO C.

ding of this statutory language would raise constitutional problems of fair warning, vagueness and lenity. EFTA00079411 LAW o•ICCS or GERALD 13. LEVCOURT. PC Chiefo the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 25, 2007 Page 4 We are, of course, mindf

flight risk. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 72 EFTA00079485 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE.: U.S. v. Tykarsky, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2567 (E.D. Pa. 2004) Internet Internet chat room "lloveoldermen2" defendant initiated communications with "14 yr-old"; s

t her for sex and had sex with her. Pled guilty but appealed 100 month, 5yr supervision & fines. Affirmed. 2422(b); 2423(b) Consummated U.S. v. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458 (3'd Cir. 2006) Internet Internet chat room "Iloveoldermen2"; defendant initiated IM chat with "14 yr- old"; indicated interest i

D Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 (USAFLS) From: Lilly Ann Sanchez ([email protected] Sent: Friday .lanuary M 7007 4:05 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: Gerald Letcourl Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Illt hope you had a great holiday season. Gerald Lefcourt and I would like to speak with you early next week on the Epst

Illt hope you had a great holiday season. Gerald Lefcourt and I would like to speak with you early next wee

y=en... 6/28/2007. MIA_CEOS_00081 EFTA00184639 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-46 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 7 of 24 LAW OIPICto or ERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. Jeffrey Mi sq. Matthew Esq. Andrew Lourie, Esq. A. Villafafia, Esq. The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida J

he purpose of knowingly engaging in unlawful sexual activity with minors. United States Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 638 (3d Cir. 2004); United Stales v Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 471 (3d Cir. 2006). This is the highest level of culpability in the four tier hierarchy of culpability that the Model Penal Codc uses

ld" neighbor; arrested in hotel where supposed to meet. • Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting Conviction affirmed. 87 EFTA01729571 I LEFCOURT'S LIST EFTA01729572

bail because not a flight risk. • 72 EFTA01729556 0:00 ., • ' CASES . 1, , - P FACILITY• . -,Piketglcial4patigfciaroN :cuact • U.S. v. Tykarsky, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2567 (E.D. Pa. 2004) • Internet Internet chat room "Iloveoldermen2" initiated communications with "14 yr-old"; sexually

et her for sex and had sex with her. Pled guilty but appealed 100 month, 5yr supervision & fines. Affirmed. 2422(6); 2423(b) Consummated U.S v. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458 (3rd Cir. 2006) Internet Internet chat room "Iloveoldermen2"; defendant initiated 114 chat with "14 yr- old"; indicated interest

LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. • PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION I AS EAST 7S"

ey were supposed to meet. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting Allowed to be released on bail because not a flight risk. U.S.' Tykarsky, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet Internet chat room "Iloveoldemien2" defendant initiated communications with 2422(b); 2423 Sting 2567 (E.D. Pa

48 EAST 78Th NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B. LEFCOURT [email protected] SHERYL E. REICH NIcle

nvince, or to try to convince, her to engage in conduct proscribed by law, the statute may not be unconstitutional on its face. See United States'. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 470 (3d Cir. 2006) (both §§ 2422(b) and 2423(6) "fall squarely Congress's power to regulate the first two categories of activities d

nt purposes. And §2422(a), unlike subsection (b), carries no mandatory minimum sentence, let alone ten years. EFTA00284189 ♦— ornocs or GERALD a LEFCOURT, PC United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 6, 2007 Page 16 first prove that Murrell, using the internet, acted with a

vince, or to try to convince, her to engage in conduct proscribed by law, the statute may not be unconstitutional on its face. See United States v. Tykarsky, 446 F.3d 458, 470 (3d Cir. 2006) (both §§ 2422(b) and 2423(b) "fall squarely within Congress's power to regulate the first two categories of activ