Epstein Secrets

agler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et al. 250 Australia

er E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger et al. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. N

does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in respqmLwprobative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A pa

Shipley West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu Goldber er et al. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. F

URNETT P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu Goldber er et al. West Palm Beac

not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian

21 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAJJOHNSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. k)Idberger aewpa.com Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton(&.bciclaw.com Isidro Manual Garcia isidrociarcia bellsouth.net Jack Patrick Hill i

ct Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. k)Idberger aewpa.com Robert D. Critton, E

e to permit an adverse inference to be drawn from exercise of the privilege does not implicate the policy considerations underlying the privilege." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S.308, 335 (1976). An adverse inference is entirely justified in this case. Epstein has remained silent when asked such straightforward requ

otion for Protective Order Relating to his Deposition and in Support of Edwards' Motion to Compel and hnposc Sanctions Page IS of IS COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Attirbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 25 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 Wet Palm Beach, FL 33401 Ph e: (561) 659-8300 : (561) 835-86

c Sanctions Page IS of IS COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Attirbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 25

plaintiff's answers can be used against him through adverse inferences. See, e.g , In re J.E.B., 971 So.2d 187, 188 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 2007) (citing Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976) ("[T]he Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civ I actions when they refuse to testify in res