Epstein Secrets

CF on this ft day of , 2009: Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz. P.A. Counsellor Plaintiff Jane Doe 03 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Cd-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00722751 Page 7 Respectfully submitted, By: ROBERT D. CRITTON

./ Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00

cause it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share all witnesses and parties were not identical); Borough of Olyphant v. PPL Corporation et al. 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civi

tein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 ounsel or Plamtill lane Doe Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jef•ey Epstein

FL 33160 ounsel or Plamtill lane Doe Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australi

cause it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share all witnesses and parties were not identical); Borough of Olyphant v. PPL Corporation et al. 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil

Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstei

160 Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australi

cause it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share all witnesses and parties were not identical); Borough of Olyphant v. PPL Corporation et al. 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Ford Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008). Under Florida Rules of Civil