Epstein Secrets

of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.,Leopold- Kuvin, P.A., Counsel for Plaintiff; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, Co-Counstaerfor Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, on this / Sia of April, 2009 & COLEMAN, LLP By: Robert D. Cr F

ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA.. and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger EFTA00614418 IN TH

TON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., and BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Brad Edwards and Associates, LLC HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, and JACK A GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger EFTA00614419 g e sz LEOPOLD—KUVIN, CONSUMER JUSTICE ATTORNEYS April 10, 2009 Fax and Mail Robert Critton, Esq. Mi

Stansfield v. Starkey, 269 Cal.Rptr., 337, 348 (Cal. App.3d, 1990) 5. Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987). 6. Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, 135 F. Supp.2d 1198, 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2001). EFTA00614427 v. Epstein Page 2 7. Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia , 253 Fed. Appx. 224 (3d

e copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 13th day of April ., 2009: Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff Fax: Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein N &

OWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, erbury Goldberger & Weiss, PA., EFTA00722688 IN THE COURT OF THE

Stansfield v. Starkey, 269 Cal.Rptr., 337, 348 (Cal. App.3d, 1990) 5. Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987). 6. Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, 135 F. Supp.2d 1198, 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2001). EFTA00722697 M v. Epstein Page 2 7. Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia , 253 Fed. Appx. 224

Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 561-835-8691 Fax Co-Cou

law.utah.edu Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Austral

ts have held that cases interpreting the Federal Rico Statute, title 18, U.S.C., are persuasive as to the meaning of Florida's Rico statute. . . "); Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, EFTA00729113 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 5 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 i . Fla. 2001); and Magnum v. Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 253 Fed.Appx. 2

FL 33301 Counsel for Plaintiff Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel 16r Defendant Jeffrey

ty, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

, citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personnel injuries). 14. at 348. In Connor v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, 135 F.Supp.2d, 1198, 1219 (M.D. Fla. 2001), the court held that claims for money damages relating to nursing home patients' deaths following massi