Epstein Secrets

day of February, 2012 to: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, E., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices o

akes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Austra

btain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has not demonstrated the absence of material issues of fact. His alleged participation in and/or knowledge of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and the validity of, and motivation in conducting, the discovery at issue in the underlying Epstein actions are matters of considerable deba

nt/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Austral

Tort Claimants and possibly others. Epstein denies this motivation EFTA00805158 and maintains his probable cause was grounded in media reports of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and the realization of the possible connection for Edwards' litigation behavior unrelated to the claims of his three clients. Court's Rulin

s Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian A

aim against both Rothstein and Edwards) in connection with the use of Epstein case materials, which were improperly utilized to lure investors into the Rothstein Ponzi scheme is clearly and irrefutably related to Edwards' counterclaim against Epstein for filing that original claim. Yet, to mislead this Court into