Epstein Secrets

day of February, 2012 to: Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, E., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012; and Marc S. Nurik, Esq., Law Offices o

akes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409; Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, 250 Austra

icated documentary evidence may not be relied on or considered in support of a motion for summary judgment. See, e.g., Hollywood Towers Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Hampton, 993 So. 2d 174, 175-176 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (unauthenticated photocopies of check, letter and bank statement attached to motion for sum

e assorted other amendments 8 that he has stood upon will continue to be 9 asserted. And presumably the 10 attorney-client privilege also? 11 MR. GOLDBERGER: Subject to 12 consultation with our client, obviously, 13 Judge. 14 THE COURT: But it sounds like it will 15 be. I am going to accept that as a

l for Epstein EFTA00589665 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd.

ing is an essential part of justice; and an overspeaking judge is no well tuned cymbal." Great Am. Ins. Co. of New York v. 2000 Island Blvd. Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 153 So. 3d 384, 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (citations omitted). Florida law mandates recusal of a judge when a litigant establishes a reasonable, well

portions of the correspondence written by government attorneys — all of the writings of Mr. Epstein's attorneys, except for a few short portions by Jack Goldberger — have been redacted"). 10 EFTA00583789 address Mr. Epstein's arguments regarding the recognition of a privilege under Fed. R. Civ. P. 501. As

ttorneys, except for a few short portions by Jack Goldberger — have been redacted"). 10 EFTA00583789 addr

Cir. 2007)(Perlman jurisdiction "does not depend on the validity of the appellant's underlying claims for relief'); Gill v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc., 399 F.3d 391, 398, 402 (1st Cir. 2005)(asserting jurisdiction under Perlman, but concluding that informant privilege was not available to private

01 Pho i0 Fax: Jack A. Esquire jg Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, . 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400

expert should not be allowed to testify concerning questions of law." Edward J. Seibert, Architect & Planner, P.A. v. Bayport Beach & Tennis Club Ass'n, Inc., 573 So. 2d 889, 892 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) citing Devin v. City of Hollywood, 351 So. 2d 1022, 1022 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Thus, Smith's purported opinio

k Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterb , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. o- ounse or

ion of legal services to the client. 2. Those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication. Las Olas River House Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Lorh, LLC, 181 So. 3d 556, 557-58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); § 90.502(1Xc), Fla. Stat. (2017); Witte v. Witte, 126 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)(sec