Epstein Secrets

arey had on June 1, 2006, with ASA regarding a meeting earlier that day between representatives of the State Attorney's Office and defense attorney Jack Goldberger (Police Report at 87). Omitted are the facts of the meeting (Police Report at 87): In addition to the presence of other defense counsel, there was i

tate Attorney's Office and defense attorney Jack Goldberger (Police Report at 87). Omitted are the facts of t

t led the State Attorney to conclude tha as neither credible nor a proper complainant.) This information, ough known to the PBPD, was omitted from the Police Report or the Probable Cause Affidavit. • !lies on her Victoria's Secret Job Application. Addition mmtion on Hall's MySpace webpagc casts further doubt

tective had on June 1, 2006, with regarding a meeting earlier that day between representatives of the State Attorney's Office and defense attorney Jack Goldberger (Police Report at 87). Omitted are the facts of the meeting (Police Report at 87): In addition to the presence of other defense counsel, there was i

tate Attorney's Office and defense attorney Jack Goldberger (Police Report at 87). Omitted are the facts of t

d the State Attorney to conclude that was neither credible nor a proper complainant.) This information, though known to the PBPD, was omitted from the Police Report or the Probable Cause Affidavit. • Lies on her Secret Job A lication. Additional information on MySpace webpage casts further doubt on her cr

June 1, 2006, with ASA Belohlavek regarding a meeting earlier that day between representatives of the State Attorney's Office and defense attorney Jack Goldberger (Police Report at page 87). Omitted are the facts of the meeting (Report at 87): In addition to the presence of other defense counsel, there was in

Barbara, PA. ·•·· JOSEPH R.ATTERBURY •·r JACKA.GOLDBERGER * JASON S. WEISS Board Certified Criminal Trial

oy" was in fact the broken handle of a salad server. Though the "sex toys" play a prominent role in the Police Report and probable cause affidavit, the Police Report was never amended to reflect the discovery of this new and highly relevant evidence. 5. Failure to Consider Exculpatory or Impeaching Evidence. Ot

ou will recall, the plea and sentencing hearing originally was to occur in early October 2007, but was delayed until the end of October to allow Mr. Goldberger to attend. It was delayed again until November to allow you to attend. You have provided no showing of how you and your client have used your best

exculpatory evidence. In Net. they refused to attend a meeting called by the State Attorney specifically to provide the relevant evidence. 'I'hus, the Police Report and Probable Cause Affidavit only offer a skewed view of the facts material to this matter. Examples follow. I. The Video Surreillance Equipment L