Epstein Secrets

D Docket 04/23/2009 Page 8 of 9 - 9 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein C

mits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that “the USAO has taken the positi

Constitution doe not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings involving a common defendant. Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Associates, Inc., 866 F.Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fla. 1994). A stay pending resolution of related criminal proceedings is warranted only when the defendant demonstrate

D Docket 04/23/2009 Page 8 of 9 - 9 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein C

mits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that “the USAO has taken the positi

Constitution doe not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings involving a common defendant. Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Associates, Inc., 866 F.Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fla. 1994). A stay pending resolution of related criminal proceedings is warranted only when the defendant demonstrate

mits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that "the USAO has taken the positi

SERVICE LIST Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Attorneys for Defendant ritton, Jr. chael James e er & Coleman 33401-2918 Lead Counsel Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. West Palm Beach FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley JaMes Edwards ler Ft. Lauderdale, F

Constitution doe not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings involving a common defendant. Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Associates, Inc. 866 F.Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fla. 1994). A stay pending resolution of related criminal proceedings is warranted only when the defendant demonstrates