Epstein Secrets

the Plaintiffs/victims were threatened and harassed. 3. As with other Plaintiffs, Jane Does 4 and 7 were first introduced to Defendant Epstein by Bayley Robson, who was a high school friend.' 4. Robson had had contact with these Plaintiffs on several occasions in which she represented to Plaintiffs Jane D

d. 3. As with other Plaintiffs, Jane Does 4 and 7 were first introduced to Defendant Epstein by Bayley Robson, who was a high school friend.' 4. Robson had had contact with these Plaintiffs on several occasions in which she represented to Plaintiffs Jane Doe 4 and 7 that she is cooperating with Defe

FFREY EPSTEIN, et al., Defendant. DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA/JOHNSON 2 EFTA00222248 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08.2009 Page 3 of 7 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al., Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, HALEY ROBSON, and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORF CLERK D.S. DIST. CT. S.O. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance wit

lez, Case No. 50 2008 DR 001141 (Palm Beach Co. Family Ct.) (1/31/08). If this turns out to be the case, there is complete diversity, regardless of Robson's citizenship. Although the Eleventh Circuit has recently indicated that a district court may not conduct jurisdictional discovery under such circu

s"). 5 Lewis Tein n. 3059 Gump Ave mut Sulu 340, Cocorout Goon. haulm 33133 So1316 EFTA00234228 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07121:2008 Page 6 of 100 1. The amount in controversy in this action exceeds $75,000. This case is a duplicate of the First Federal Lawsuit. In th

o have it recopied to have an original in evidence and a working copy with the file. Upon researching the file, it was discovered that the suspect, Haley Robson's cellular calls wer sub oenaed incorrectly. The suspect telephone number was and the original request was for . I requeste t e information through

lalliehinitially denied anything had happened, only admitting to going with Haley (later identif ed as Haley Robson) to Palm Beach to pick up money Robson was owed. identified Haley Robson as the cousin of her former boyfriend She ultimately admitted to knowing that Robson worked for a wealthy man an

con I woAae.l•lo ORA al AIM EFTA00184424 Case 8:21tivagl-Mg4 Kjaacument 361-30 _Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 12 of uocument .0;zred on FLSD Docket 05/04/2009 Page 11 of 27 she would return to the United States to testify. Terrified by Defendant's demonstrated ability to track her down on her c

iderable discretion in ruling on a motion to set aside an entry of default, and the Court's decision will only be reviewed for abuse of discretion. Robinson, US, 734 F.2d 735, 739 (11111 Cir. 1984); Baez 1. S.S. Kresge Co., 518 F.2d 349, 350 (5th Cir. 1975).' "[D]efaults are seen with disfavor because o

Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16'2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80380-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff,

iderable discretion in ruling on a motion to set aside an entry of default, and the Court's decision will only be reviewed for abuse of discretion. Robinson. US, 734 F.2d 735, 739 (11111 Cir. 1984); Baez. S.S. Kresge Co., 518 F.2d 349, 350 (5th Cir. 1975).' "[D]efaults are seen with disfavor because of

mons and complaint to Defendant on May 12, 2008, via first class mail. (DE 4.) The 1 EFTA00222636 Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2008 Page 2 of 6 envelope was marked "personal and confidential" and did not indicate that the envelope was from an attorney or related to a

diction. (b) There is no ossibili that the plaintiff can establish a cause of action against under Florida law. (i) The conspiracy claim against Robson must fail. As a general rule, "[a]n actionable conspiracy [under Florida law] requires an actionable underlying tort or wrong." Wright v. Yurko, 44

FTA00180304 Case !:i:08-cv 1 2 3 80119-KAM Document 180 Entered UNITED STATES SOUTHERN DISTRICT WEST PALM CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA on FLSD Docket 06/24/2009 Page 1 of 51 DISTRICT COURT OF FLORIDA BEACH DIVISION 4 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 5 JANE DOE, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, vs. JUNE 12