Epstein Secrets

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 14 Request No. 14. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Haley Robson, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Haley Robson, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Para

tz & Cartaya, P.A. Centurion Tower, Suite 1110 1601 Forum Place West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 682-3202 Fax: (561) 682-3206 Counsel for Haley Robson Served via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid 5 of 4 EFTA00234460

682-3202 Fax: (561) 682-3206 Counsel for Haley Robson Served via U.S. Mail, postage prepaid 5 of 4 E

Docket 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOIINSON JANE DOE, a/k/a, JANE DOE NO. I, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S SN1 and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND EXPEDITE CERTAIN DISCOVERY Plaintiff J

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Haley Robson, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 14 Request No. 14. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Haley Robson, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES De

ls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas. 12. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was Haley Robson, a Palm Beach HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. 09/12/2019 - 2 - 71 1ge 1 CONFIDENTIAL vAwthermanlaw.com Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM

rida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, Ms. Robson would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs,

ngar for signs of his private jet’s arrivals and,departures. They quickly learned that the woman who took the 14-year-old girl to Epstein’s house was Haley Robson, a Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee. In a sworn statement at police headquarters. Robson, then 18, admitted she had taken at lea

m Beach Community College ·when she was questioned by police last October. She has, ah,uhlisted phone number and could.not be reached for comment. Rob.son s_aid she met :Epstein wh~IJ., ,at, age 17, a fri.end as_ked he.r if she woµld lik~ to make money giving him a massage. She.said she was driven to h

e. Thank you. THE COURT: Thanks very much. MR. EDWARDS: I believe my next client who is going to speak is probably going to speak as Jane Doe. JANE DOE NO. 1: Yes, Jane Doe. THE COURT: We'll say Jane Doe No. 1, just for the record. JANE DOE NO. 1: Okay. Thank you for allowing us to speak today.

6/06/2017 Page 26 of 32 unfairly prejudice the opposing party. Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering. Inc. 731 F.3d 1171, 1182 (11th Cir. 2013) citing Robinson v. Tyson Foods. Inc., 595 F.3d 1269, 1273 (11th Cir. 2010). In their state court tort actions against Epstein, both petitioners invoked the provisi

iolate the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00799825 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 408 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2017 Page 2 of 32 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the

iderable discretion in ruling on a motion to set aside an entry of default, and the Court's decision will only be reviewed for abuse of discretion. Robinson. US, 734 F.2d 735, 739 (11111 Cir. 1984); Baez. S.S. Kresge Co., 518 F.2d 349, 350 (5th Cir. 1975).' "[D]efaults are seen with disfavor because of

ument 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80381-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT THIS CAUSE comes before the Co

rida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, Ms. Robson would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf

ww.hsmv.flejn.net/servletIDLSurnmary 1/25/2008 EFTA00257042 EFTA00257043 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually, Plaintiffs,

/02/2017 Page 27 of 33 unfairly prejudice the opposing party. Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering. Inc. 731 F.3d 1171, 1182 (11th Cir. 2013) citing Robinson v. Tyson Foods. Inc., 595 F.3d 1269, 1273 (11th Cir. 2010). In their state court tort actions against Epstein, both petitioners invoked the provisi

late the CVRA rights of either petitioner. EFTA00591462 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 401-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 3 of 33 II. JANE DOE NO. 2 CANNOT INVOKE THE CVRA BECAUSE SHE OPENLY OPPOSED AND WAS HOSTILE TO THE PROSECUTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Petitioners have not distinguished the