Epstein Secrets

greement); In re Arnett, 804 F.2d 1200 (1111 Cw.1986) (plea agreement); Rowe v. Griffin, 676 F.2d 624 (11th Cir. 1982) (immunity) United States v. Weiss, 599 F.2d 780, 737 (6th Cir.1979) (immunity) (Tuttle, J.) ('lle protect the voluntariness of a waiver of fifth amendment rights, where a plea, co

ess for him. The Defendants' Travel (191) On or about March 11, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELLEN, and NADIA MARCINKOVA traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey, to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. R (192) On or about May 1, 2004, Defendants

future, and you decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, Mr. Epstein's attorney, Jack Goldberger as s th t u h at Atterbury Gonberger and Weiss, , (561) 659-8300. In addition, there has been litigation between the United States and two other victims regarding the disclosure of the entire

tely owned civilian aircraft in Miami in the Southern District of Florida. His pilot had filed a flight plan showy66 arties were about to return to Teterboro, NJ. After the conversation with , Mr. M in became concerned that the FBI would try to serve his traveling companion, Marcinkova, with a similar g

Mr. Goldberger, and had no idea that Mr. Goldberger's law partner was married to a sex-crimes prosecutor—much less that that fact would trigger Ms. Weiss's recusal. And Ms. Belohbvek—not Ms. Weiss—remained in charge of the State's prosecution of Mr. Epstein before, during, and after the retention of

erion Air, Inc. I 11 (225) On or about September 29, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, • a/k/a "Adriana Mucinslca," and NADIA MEN. traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. All in violation of Title 18, United States Co