Epstein Secrets

viduals. Mr. Scarola agreed. Id. at 203, 0 4-16. 13 Epstein's counsel proceeded to other areas of inquiry. He asked if Edwards had ever spoken to Alfredo Rodriguez during the hiatus between the deposition sessions with Rodriguez. A claim of work product privilege was made. Id. At 205-206. Edwards refused to 10

roceeded to other areas of inquiry. He asked if Edwards had ever spoken to Alfredo Rodriguez during the hiatus between the deposition sessions with Rodriguez. A claim of work product privilege was made. Id. At 205-206. Edwards refused to 10 EFTA00606635 answer any questions about his communications wit

101/20 101/21-22 101/24-25 - 102/1-6 102/7-8 102/24-25 - 103/9-16 A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Q. Same question with regard to L.M. Miller. A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Q. And same question with regard to Jane Doe. A. Same objection and instruction. Q. Prior to your f

t Mr. Rodriguez completed his deposition on August 7th of 2009, did you have an occasion to speak with either the FBI, well, with the FBI regarding Alfredo Rodriguez?/d. at page 20; line 11-15. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 210; line 16-17. Q: Did you after Mr. Rodriguez's completion of

e 16. The subject matter of the deposition turned to Alfredo Rodriguez. Counsel for Epstein attempts to discuss the two separate dates on which Mr. Rodriguez was deposed in the Epstein cases and seeks to determine the scope of Mr. Edwards's knowledge of Mr. Rodriguez: Q: Between those two dates, that is

ey's Office? Id. at page 101; line 5-12. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Id. at page 101; line 13-14. Q: Same question with regard to L.M. Miller. Id. at page 101; linel6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Id. at page 101; line 21-22. Q: Prior to your filing the lawsuit with United

t Mr. Rodriguez completed his deposition on August 7th of 2009, did you have an occasion to speak with either the FBI, well, with the FBI regarding Alfredo Rodriguez?/d. at page 20; line 11-15. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 210; line 16-17. Q: Did you after Mr. Rodriguez's completion of

e 16. The subject matter of the deposition turned to Alfredo Rodriguez. Counsel for Epstein attempts to discuss the two separate dates on which Mr. Rodriguez was deposed in the Epstein cases and seeks to determine the scope of Mr. Edwards's knowledge of Mr. Rodriguez: Q: Between those two dates, that is

ey's Office? Id. at page 101; line 5-12. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Id. at page 101; line 13-14. Q: Same question with regard to L.M. Miller. Id. at page 101; linel6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Id. at page 101; line 21-22. Q: Prior to your filing the lawsuit with United