Epstein Secrets

of arrest Yellow Notepad with notes Enforcing Victim's Rights —April 26, 2012 Index of Victim Notification Letters EFTA00194825 CD — 3 calls Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 10.29.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and CW 10.28.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 11.2.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and

tion Letters EFTA00194825 CD — 3 calls Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 10.29.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez

rcing Victim's Rights —April 26, 2012 Index of Victim Notification Letters EFTA00194825 CD — 3 calls Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 10.29.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and CW 10.28.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 11.2.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 11.3.09 CD — Meet Alfredo Rodriguez and F

tepad with notes Enforcing Victim's Rights —April 26, 2012 Index of Victim Notification Letters EFTA00194825 CD — 3 calls Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 10.29.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and CW 10.28.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 11.2.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 11.3

Attn: ELSUR Betsy N. Colon From: Miami PB-2/Palm Beach County RA Contact: Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) Title: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION Synopsis: EC regarding late submission of recordings to ELSUR. Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO R

Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent

ually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

In a Motel Roan 3. Interceotee(s): (If Public Official, Include Tale and Entity) 4. Consenting Party (Identify ONLY on Field Office Copy): Name: Alfredo Rodriguez UCE 17 Protect Identity Source S: SRO 0 And others yet unknown 4a. The folkiwing mandatory requirements naye been oc will be met. prior to Consensua

as contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth Edwards is an attorney who Is representing four female individuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein. Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed Rodriguez and served him with a federal subpoena to provide any and all documents relating to the case

ly- monitored:phone calls between subject ALFREDO-,RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and. phone, calls between. RODRIGUEZ an. FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take. down. of RODRIGUEZ on November-3/ 2909 were_submittedlate..due to.the case agent preparing a

o Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/18/2009 (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 2 SEALED ORDER granting I Motion to Seal Criminal Complaint as to Alfredo Rodriguez (1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/1/2009. (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT as to Alfredo Rodrigu

in a pending civil case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, he came into contact with Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), who was a subpoenaed witness in the civil case. 4. Rodriguez had been interviewed by FBI agents on January 18, 2007, in connection with a fede

nformation and exchange. The associate that the CW referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th

o Rodriguez. Responses due by 12/18/2009 (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 2 SEALED ORDER granting I Motion to Seal Criminal Complaint as to Alfredo Rodriguez (1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/1/2009. (tmn) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/01/2009 a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT as to Alfredo Rodrigu

in a pending civil case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, he came into contact with Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), who was a subpoenaed witness in the civil case. 4. Rodriguez had been interviewed by FBI agents on January 18, 2007, in connection with a fede

nformation and exchange. The associate that the CW referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th

. 5/85) Criminal Complaint AUSA VILLAFAl4A FILED by United States District Court DEC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. STEVEN M. LARIMORE CI ERK U S. 0:ST. CT. Cr FLA. WAS. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT CASE NUMBER: 09-8308-LRJ I, the undersigned complainant,

in a pending civil case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, he came into contact with Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), who was a subpoenaed witness in the civil case. 4. Rodriguez had been interviewed by FBI agents on January 18, 2007, in connection with a fede

nformation and exchange. The associate that the I referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th

10 To: Miami Attn: rom: Miami PB-2/Palm Beach County RA Contact: SA Approved By: Drafted By: J: cjp Case ID 4: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) Title: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION Synopsis: EC regarding late submission of recordings to ELSUR. Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO ROD

Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent

ually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

10 To: Miami Attn: ELSUR From: Miami PB-2/Palm Beach County RA Contact: SA Approved By: Drafted By: cjp Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) Title: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION Synopsis: EC regarding late submission of recordings to ELSUR. Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO ROD

Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent

ually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

10 To: Miami Attn: ELSUR From: Miami PB-2/Palm Beach County RA Contact: SA Approved By: Drafted By: cjp Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) Title: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION Synopsis: EC regarding late submission of recordings to ELSUR. Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO ROD

dings to ELSUR. Details: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness ICW) and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the tale down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent

etails: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness ICW) and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the tale down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

09 P e 1 of 7 AO 91 Rev. 5/85 Criminal Complaint A 4.111 United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. I LED by DEC - AM S1ZVfN m tArrisORE CA tIt t S n:"zs CI S ft 111 f I. A N.013 CRIMINAL CO PLAINT CASE NUMBER: 09-8308-LRJ I, t

in a pending civil case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, he came into contact with Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), who was a subpoenaed witness in the civil case. 4. Rodriguez had been interviewed by FBI agents on January 18, 2007, in connection with a fede

nformation and exchange. The associate that the CW referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th