ually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

ly- monitored:phone calls between subject ALFREDO-,RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and. phone, calls between. RODRIGUEZ an. FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take. down. of RODRIGUEZ on November-3/ 2909 were_submittedlate..due to.the case agent preparing a

5. (We have not yet received the overnighted hard copy.) Summary of 1A audio: • Law Enforcement interviews • Law Enforcement controlled calls and FBI UCE calls/meets • Music albums/tracks • Duplicates of many of these files due to case overlaps Note: We could not review file BOX 001_CDS; CD09 as non

nformation and exchange. The associate that the I referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th

etails: Consensually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness ICW) and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the tale down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

tepad with notes Enforcing Victim's Rights —April 26, 2012 Index of Victim Notification Letters EFTA00194825 CD — 3 calls Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 10.29.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and CW 10.28.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 11.2.09 CD — Call Alfredo Rodriguez and FBI UCE 11.3

ually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

ually monitored phone calls between subject ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ and complaining witness (CW) BRADLEY EDWARDS and phone calls between RODRIGUEZ and an FBI UCE, along with audio and video surveillance of the take down of RODRIGUEZ on November 3, 2009 were submitted late due to the case agent preparing and

nformation and exchange. The associate that the CW referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th

nformation and exchange. The associate that the CW referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th

nformation and exchange. The associate that the CW referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th

nformation and exchange. The associate that the CW referred to was, in fact, an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. 9. On October 29, 2009, the FBI UCE contacted Rodriguez via telephone. Rodriguez again explained that he would only turn over the information in exchange for monetary compensation. Th