Epstein Secrets

teenage girls, an attorney representing seven of the victims said Friday. New details about the contents of the journal were released this week when.Alfredo Rodriguez,,who worked as a property manager for the Palm Beach resident, pleaded guilty to obstruction ofjustice for lying to federal agents: when asked if he had a

a specific list ofvictims that the U.S. Attorneys Office knew about when it penned the deal in 2007. If additional victims are listed in the journal Rodriguez stole, Horowitz said, federal prosecutors could reopen the investigation. “It opens the door for further prosecution,” he said. In addition to turnin

andling of the 2006 charges and the civil suits that followed. 40. In a July 8, 2019, letter to the federal district court by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Epstein was described as "a serial sexual predator who preyed on dozens of minor girls over a period of years." The letter emphasized that "the Gov

enage girls1 an attorney representing seven of the victims said Friday. New details about the contents of the journal were released this week when Alfredo Rodriguez1 who worked as a property manager for the Palm Beach resident, pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice for lying to federal agents when asked if h

pecific list of victims that the U.S. Attorney's Office knew about when it penned the deal in 2007. If additional victims are listed in the journal Rodriguez stole, Horowitz said federal prosecutors could reopen the investigation. "It opens the door for further prosecution," he said. In addition to turn

andling of the 2006 charges and the civil suits that followed. 37. In a July 8, 2019, letter to the federal district court by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Epstein was described as “a serial sexual predator who preyed on dozens of minor girls over a period of years.” The letter emphasized that “the Gov

y 2005, the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern _ District of Florida learned of Epstein’s repeated sexual a

it E; Deposition of E.W., Deposition Attachment #4. 8 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010573 --- PAGE BREAK --- 15. One of Mr. Epstein’s household employees, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein’s mansion for purported “massages.” See Rodriguez Depo. at 242-44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodrig

riguez, saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein’s mansion for purported “massages.” See Rodriguez Depo. at 242-44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodriguez was aware that “sex toys” and vibrators were found in Epstein’s bedroom after the purported massages. Jd. at 223-28. Rodriguez thought what Epstein w

ttachment #17); See deposition of Epstein's pilot Larry Eugene Morrison, October 6, 2009, page 102-103 (Deposition Attachment #18); See deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez, August 7, 2009, page 302-306 and 348 (Deposition Attachment #8); See also Prince Andrew's Friend, Ghislaine Maxwell, Some Underage Girls an

agreed that he would not contest jurisdiction in the Southern District of Florida for any victim who chose to sue him fo

it E; Deposition of E.W., Deposition Attachment #4. 8 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013326 --- PAGE BREAK --- 15. One of Mr. Epstein’s household employees, Mr. Alfredo Rodriguez, saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein’s mansion for purported “massages.” See Rodriguez Depo. at 242-44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodrig

riguez, saw numerous underage girls coming into Epstein’s mansion for purported “massages.” See Rodriguez Depo. at 242-44 (Deposition Attachment #8). Rodriguez was aware that “sex toys” and vibrators were found in Epstein’s bedroom after the purported massages. Jd. at 223-28. Rodriguez thought what Epstein w

ttachment #17); See deposition of Epstein's pilot Larry Eugene Morrison, October 6, 2009, page 102-103 (Deposition Attachment #18); See deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez, August 7, 2009, page 302-306 and 348 (Deposition Attachment #8); See also Prince Andrew's Friend, Ghislaine Maxwell, Some Underage Girls an

that the crime be Iserved as U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida em an interstate nexus. Secoi e . : |

ho'd been molested 4 on El Brillo Way. Recarey i i ey interviewed one of Epstein’s pilots, a man named avid Rogers, as well as Epstein’s houseman, Alfredo Rodriguez " Healso s : poke to a woman who really was a massage therapist It i turned out that Epstein paid just one hundred dollars for "act = Swedish es p

Rodriguez did not know was that the associate in question was an undercover employee (UCE) of the FBI. A few days later, on November 2, the UCE calls Rodri- guez and sets up a meeting, which takes place the following day. “During the meeting, Rodriguez produced a small bound book and several sheets of legal p

pstein, case number 08-80893 in: federal Court in the Southern District of Florida. | am the lead attorney representing °

that I send drafts to is Jeffrey” The Talented Mr. Epstein, By Vicky Ward on January, 2005 in Published Work, Vanity Fair; (c) Epstein’s housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez testified that Dershowitz stayed at Epstein’s house during the years most relevant to my clients; (d) Rodriguez testified that Dershowitz was at Epst

ir; (c) Epstein’s housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez testified that Dershowitz stayed at Epstein’s house during the years most relevant to my clients; (d) Rodriguez testified that Dershowitz was at Epstein’s house at times when underage females where there being molested by Epstein (see Alfredo Rodriguez depositi

. Schall, Special Counsel to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, to inform her Office of the Post’s in

sses: Two of Epstein’s butlers gave Recarey sworn interviews, confirming that young girls had been coming and going at the house. One of the butlers, Alfredo Rodriguez, told Recarey that when he was tasked with cleaning up the master bath after Epstein’s sessions with the girls, he often discovered sex toys. Once, h

Once, he accidentally stumbled on a high school girl, whom he identified, sleeping naked in Epstein’s spa, he testified in a 2009 court deposition. Rodriguez said he was given the job of paying the girls, telling Recarey that he was “a human ATM machine” because he was ordered by Epstein to keep $2,000 on

a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, an alleged victim said that Epstein,

e victims told police they waited in the kitchen to be called upstairs for a massage, and the house chef often gave them a bite to eat. House manager Alfredo Rodriguez said in his sworn statement that a maid named Lupita, who was a devout Catholic, wept when she complained to him about cleaning up after the HOUSE_O

towels and putting away the sex toys. And she was upset that a photo of Epstein with the pope hung next to one of him with a young girl. Ironically, Rodriguez, who ran the house on El Brillo Way in 2004 and 2005, ended up being sentenced to more jail time than his boss as a result of the complex investigati

r release on July 14, 2020, the Court DENIES the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail.' I. Background On June 29, 2020, a grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a six-count Indictment against the Defendant, charging her with facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of multiple minor victims betw

tates v. English, 629 F.3d 311, 319 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001)); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 950 F.2d 85, 88 (2d Cir. 1991) ("[A] defendant must introduce some evidence contrary to the presumed fact in order to rebut the presumption."). Non

e, e.g., United States v. Grillo, No. 99-1514, 1999 WL 1456536, at *2 (3d Cir. July 13, 1999); United States v. Salvagno, 314 F. Supp. 2d 115, 119 (N.D.N.Y. 2004); United States v. Karni, 298 F. Supp. 2d 129, 132-33 (D.D.C. 2004); United States v. Chen, 820 F. Supp. 1205, 1212 (N.D. Cal. 1992). In those

(S.D.N.Y. 2005) has been a party to lawsuits in the South- ern District of New York, both as a plain- tiff and defendant.

dant. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 171 F.3d 779, 784 (2d Cir.1999). Because these m