Epstein Secrets

iv. P. 53(e), and other applicable Federal Rules and Local Rules. In support, Epstein states: I. This court entered an order (DE 555) stating that Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez")(DE 469), must produce, to the extent in his possession, " ... any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey E

he extent in his possession, " ... any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey Epstein including the journal described by Rodriguez to Palm Beach Police that [allegedly] contains the names of girls who visited the residence." (DE 555, p.2) 2. As set forth m Rodriguez's depositi

means, such as theft or intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc., 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(internal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marean Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289, 299 (S

ctive Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). In support, Epstein states: Procedural Background 1. This court entered an order (DE 555) stating that Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez")(DE 469), must produce, to the extent in his possession, " ... any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey E

ing to Jeffrey Epstein including the journal described by Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 560 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2010 Page 2 of 11 Rodriguez to Palm Beach Police that [allegedly) contains the names of girls who visited the residence." (the "journal" or "book") (DE 555, p.2) 2. On June 4

means, such as theft or intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc., 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(internal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marean Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289,299 (S.

ctive Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). In support, Epstein states: Procedural Background 1. This court entered an order (DE 555) stating that Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez")(DE 469), must produce, to the extent in his possession, "...any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey Eps

her third parties or attach any portion of same to any pleadings pending the outcome of the Rule 4 Appeal. att infra A roument 3. As set forth in Rodriguez's deposition, he was an employee of Epstein. Rodriguez Deposition, Exhibit "A" at p. 12-13. Moreover, as an individual employee, Rodriguez claims

means, such as theft or intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc. 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(intemal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marcan Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289, 299 (S.

There are at least two potential avenues through which JE can seek to obtain return of the stolen book and/or a prohibition against dissemination by Rodriguez (leaving aside the procedural issues present at this stage of the proceedings, after the Magistrate Judge has already ordered Rodriguez to produce

o use or to disclose to third persons . . . in competition to the principal or to his injury, trade secrets or other similar confidential matters. Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. I 967)( internal quotation marks omitted). See A.N. Emery Co. v. Marcan Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289 (S.D.N