4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
8 / 4
Mentions
d States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. I at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted abov
s of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova
152 VIII. There Is No Basis to Strike Any Portion of the Indictment 157 A. Relevant Facts 158 B. Applicable Law 159 C. Discussion 161 IX. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One or Count Three as '\lultiplicitous Is Premature 169 A. Relevant Facts 169 B. Applicable Law 170 C. Discussion 172 X. Th
d States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted abov
s of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova
ations set forth in Section 3283 applies to the crimes charged in Counts One through Four of the Indictment and her motion should be denied. III. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on Alleged Improper Pre- Trial Delay Should Be Denied The defendant contends that the Indictment should be dismissed
d States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted abov
s of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova
ations set forth in Section 3283 applies to the crimes charged in Counts One through Four of the Indictment and her motion should be denied. III. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on Alleged Improper Pre- Trial Delay Should Be Denied The defendant contends that the Indictment should be dismissed
d States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. NPA at 5; Def. Mot. 1 at 20-21. Aside from the reference to "United States" which, as noted abov
s of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova
limitations set forth in § 3283 applies to the crimes charged in Counts One through Four of the Indictment and her motion should be denied. III. The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on Alleged Improper Pre- Trial Delay Should Be Denied The defendant contends that the Indictment should be dismissed
Entities connected to both Sarah Kellen and The Defendant's Motion

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Lesley Groff
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONNadia Marcinkova
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONDarren Indyke
PERSON
Palm Beach
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION