4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
12 / 4
Mentions
uting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
nts, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
xceed the harm suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not
uting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
nts, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
xceed the harm suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not
uting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
nts, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
xceed the harm suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008),I2 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not
rsons constituting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
clude Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
uals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
xceed the harm suffered by the opposing party if the injunction issued; and (4) an injunction would not disserve the public interest. See North Am. Med. Corp. v. Axiom Worldwide, Inc., 522 F.3d 1211, 1217 (11th Cir. 2008).12 Because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary and drastic remedy, it is not
Entities connected to both Nadia Marcinkova and Med. Corp.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Joe Biden
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
West Palm Beach
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON