4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
12 / 4
Mentions
uting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
nts, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
uting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
nts, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
uting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
nts, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
rsons constituting the enterprise included a group of individuals associated in fact. These individuals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time. 44. The criminal enterprise had a definite structure. The enterprise operated together on a contin
clude Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at this time.
uals include Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and and Nadia Marcinkova, as well as other persons unknown at
recognition of the contract as subsisting or any conduct inconsistent with an intention of avoiding it, have the effect of an election to affirm. Hendricks v. Stark, 99 Fla. 277, 285, 126 So. 293, 296-97 (Fla. 1930) (internal quotation omitted); see, e.g., United States v. Baird, 218 F.3d 221, 230-31 (3d Cir. 20
Entities connected to both Nadia Marcinkova and Hendricks v. Stark

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Joe Biden
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
West Palm Beach
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON