Epstein Secrets

y bodyguard and movie stuntman, according to the league’s Web site. The New Jersey resident visited Epstein seven times in July. Zinoviev, Schank and Mar.cinkova could not be reached for comment. Staff researcher Niels Heimeriks contributed to this story,. FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3

ree times in July, according to a jail visitor's log. Kellen lists a Manhattan home address. Reached by telephone, she declined to discuss Epstein. - Nadia Marcinkova, 23, whose familyin Yugoslavia Epstein paidmoney to so that he could bring her to the United States to. be his “sex. slave," two teenage girls told p

o that he could bring her to the United States to be his ''sex slave," two teenage girls told police. One girL told police that Epstein instructed Marcirikova and her to kiss and have sex while .he watched and masturbat~<;l. Anoth~r said she engag~d in se"?C with Marcinkova at Epstein's urging. Marcinkova

by telephone, she declined to discuss Epstein. - Nadia Marcinkova, 23, whose familyin Yugoslavia Epstein

e. Thank you. THE COURT: Thanks very much. MR. EDWARDS: I believe my next client who is going to speak is probably going to speak as Jane Doe. JANE DOE NO. 1: Yes, Jane Doe. THE COURT: We'll say Jane Doe No. 1, just for the record. JANE DOE NO. 1: Okay. Thank you for allowing us to speak today.

te any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. Further, upon execution of this agreement and a plea agreement with the State Attorney's Office, the federal Grand Jury investigation will be susp

rah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. Further, upon execution of this agreement and a

to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova. Further, upon execution of this agre

R, individually, Plaintiffs, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No. 1, by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and

e No. 21. Epstein Page 16 Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2009 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, I. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUC

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 16 Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Para

communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes,

No. 2 v. Epstein Page 16 Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Nada Marcinkova, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails. Response: Defendant is asserting

-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES De

ion can appeal from 11 EFTA00209480 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 17 of 25 a final judgment, and the law is to the contrary. See Marino. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301 (1988)("The rule that only parties to a lawsuit, or those that properly become parties, may appeal an adverse judgment, is wel

Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 1 of 25 No. 13-12923 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOES NO. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees I. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenor/Appellants INTERVENOR

ion can appeal from 11 EFTA00209549 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 17 of 25 a final judgment, and the law is to the contrary. See Marino. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301 (1988)("The rule that only parties to a lawsuit, or those that properly become parties, may appeal an adverse judgment, is wel

Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 07/12/2013 Page: 1 of 25 No. 13-12923 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOES NO. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees I. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenor/Appellants INTERVENOR

1th Cir. 2007) 6 Lake Utopia Paper Ltd. v. Connelly Containers, Inc., 608 F.2d 928 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1076 (1980) 34,37,38 Marino v. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301 (1988) 52 Mezu v. Morgan State University, 495 Fed. Appx. 286 (4th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S.Ct. 991 (2013) 55 *Mis

Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Page: 1 of 75 No. 13-12923 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOES NO. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenors/Appellants ON APPEA