Epstein Secrets

it's interesting, because you heard defense counsel here not too long ago saying that they wanted to get in police reports of an under-aged minor, Virginia Giuffre, from when she was 14, being raped by two SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011426 10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne)

efense will take a differing point of view on this, but in our view, the conspiracy's next echelon is Kellen and Marcinkova. And so for example, Ms. Giuffre has made allegations about certain things. Ms. Maxwell can't remember or denies them, so of course Ms. Giuffre then looks to corroborate her allegat

in trying to preserve that nonprosecution agreement, which means, of course, attacking people who are attacking the nonprosecution agreement, such as Jane Doe 3, that is, my client, Ms. Giuffre. And that is the first factor, the nature of the relationship there. Very tightly bound. The second one is the de

to get in police reports of an under-aged minor, Virginia Giuffre, from when she was 14, being raped by two

ositions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

g to preserve that nonprosecution 8 agreement, which means, of course, attacking people who are 9 attacking the nonprosecution agreement, such as Jane Doe 3, 10 that is, my client, Ms. 11 And that is the first factor, the nature of the 12 relationship there. Very tightly bound. 13 The second one i

we have no 9 control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring 10 them to cooperate in any sense. 11 I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. 12 Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last 13 night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is 14 Mr.

y kind of evidence against Prof. Dershowitz. See, Coquina Investments, 760 F.3d at 1310 (11th Cir. 2014). Conclusion I

sed above show a complete lack of investigation into the credibility of the woman making these scurrilous allegations®, what is most remarkable about Jane Doe #3’s Response is what it omits. Approximately six years ago, Jane Doe #3 took advantage of the NPA’s provisions, sued Mr. Epstein and received a monetary