Epstein Secrets

ody had taken the photograph. Given the surrounding circumstances, I thought perhaps Mr. Epstein had taken the photograph. So that would have shown Virginia Roberts's sexual abuse was not confined just to Florida, not confined to the New York mansion, it would have -- it would have presumably continued into London

cumstances I did think it was highly fair to draw an inference from Mr. Epstein, particularly where, you know, like some of the sexual abuse involved Virginia, Epstein, and Dershowitz was the allegations, you know, the trafficking and so forth. So you know, if Virginia is making an allegation, Mr. Epstein

DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 114 2010. What had happened was, S.R. was a young woman who had been sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein. She was identified in the nonprosecution agreement as sex abuse victim, and we had

at confirm that same information. Q. Okay. And so my question is that it is true that you have spoken with a number of reporters on background about Virginia Roberts's allegations in this case, correct? A. Well, a number -- a few, I would say, is probably a more accurate characterization. Q. Andin any of those ba

of any evidence -- let me back A. Yeah. ovazss 11 that up. Q. Were you aware as of December 30th of 2014 -- ovars7 12 Are -- during the period that Virginia let me back up a moment. oa7s9 13 Roberts contends she was sexually abused, which I A. Sure. ox4a02 14 understand to be middle of 1999 to middle of

Q. Put it this way: How are they identified in the caption that you filed? A. Well, also the three that were filed, one was ~~ one was the initials S.R. I referred to Miss S.R. yesterday. That was the Jane Doe case in Federal Court in front of Judge Marra. There were two state claims. I'll -- I'll i

S RESPONSE: (b) 2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the procedures for notification and the legal bases

ormation), I represented four victims of Epstein's sex offenses in Federal Court — Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and a victim I will refer to as "S.R." and "M.J.", and other victims of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse as well. If further information is disclosed about this case, that will not discourage the

See also 6/2/2017 Villafafia Decl. atilt 6-13, 15, 19-21, 25, 33- 34, 38; 2d Kuyrkendall Decl. at fi 8-9; DE361-62. Furthermore, with regard to Ms. Giuffre and Jane Doe 5, one had informed the FBI that she did not want to be bothered again about the Epstein matter and the other had refused to speak to

under the NPA. See id. at 91 35-36. 100. Admitted to the extent that the Government assumes that "Jane Doe 5" refers to an individual with initials S.R. and with the qualification that Jane Doe 1 and two other victims had been informed in October 2007 about the NPA. See id. at II 32-33; 2d Kuyrkendal

See also 6/2/2017 Villafafia Decl. atilt 6-13, 15, 19-21, 25, 33- 34, 38; 2d Kuyrkendall Decl. at fi 8-9; DE361-62. Furthermore, with regard to Ms. Giuffre and Jane Doe 5, one had informed the FBI that she did not want to be bothered again about the Epstein matter and the other had refused to speak to

under the NPA. See id. at 91 35-36. 100. Admitted to the extent that the Government assumes that "Jane Doe 5" refers to an individual with initials S.R. and with the qualification that Jane Doe 1 and two other victims had been informed in October 2007 about the NPA. See id. at II 32-33; 2d Kuyrkendal

rneys, Seattle Oklahoma County Bar Assn, Oklahoma City Connecticut Trial Lawyers Assn, Hartford Judge Advocate General's School, Charlottesville, Virginia Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto Florida Bar Assn, Tampa and Miami Bolt, Beranek & Newman, Cambridge Colloquium on New Ways of Analyzing Var

y, C., Fowler, N.B., Nelson, K.J., Bernstein, D. M.& Loftus, EF. (2008) The persistence of false beliefs. Acta Psychologica 129, 190-197 Berkowitz, S.R., Laney, C., Morris, E.K., Garry, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2008) Pluto Behaving Badly: False beliefs and their consequences. American Journal of Psycholo

charges, would register as a sex offender for life, and "he had made certain concessions related to the payment of damages to the victims, including Jane Doe #I." (DE48 at 12.) Despite this, Petitioners suggest that it was "quite reasonable" for Jane Doe #1 to believe that "Jane Doe #1 also understood her ow

ttorney's Office. She provided additional details of Epstein's sexual abuse of her." (DE48 at 17.) And, one of Petitioners' counsel's other clients, S.R., was originally interviewed in October 2007 and refused to provide information regarding Epstein. (DEI4 at ¶ 7.) During the time that Epstein was c

S RESPONSE: (b) 2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the procedures for notification and the legal bases

ormation), I represented four victims of Epstein's sex offenses in Federal Court — Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and a victim I will refer to as "S.R." and "M.J.", and other victims of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse as well. If further information is disclosed about this case, that will not discourage the

llow the Fifth Circuit's holding in Dean (and the view of the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Eastern District of Virginia) and conclude that the CVRA extends rights to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 under the facts of this case. C. The U.S. Attorney's Office Has Previous

ttorney's Office. She provided additional details of Epstein's sexual abuse of her." (DE48 at 17.) And, one of Petitioners' counsel's other clients, S.R., was originally interviewed in October 2007 and refined to provide information regarding Epstein. (DE 14 at ¶ 7.) During the time that Epstein was

STATES RESPONSE: 2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the procedures for notification and the legal bases

ormation), I represented four victims of Epstein's sex offenses in Federal Court — Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and a victim I will refer to as "S.R." and "M.J.", and other victims of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse as well. If further information is disclosed about this case, that will not discourage the