Epstein Secrets

d acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, t

al abuse Allegations. Rather, these records are an important part of this case, since they not only support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre, but also indisputably establish Edwards and Cassell’s strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. Moreover, contrary to assertions made i

uded that “at this juncture in the proceedings” details about the sexual abuse she had suffered was unnecessary to making a determination “of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join [the other victims’] claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details r

at question. I am aware that never before 2014, end of December, was it ever, ever alleged that I had acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, that Ihad ever been with her. I was completely aware ofthat. There had never been any allega

body had taken the photograph. Given the surrounding circumstances, I thought perhaps Mr. Epstein had taken the photograph. So that would have shown Virginia Roberts's sexual abuse was not confined just to Florida, not confined to the New York mansion; it would have -- it would have presumably continued into London

owerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was former Harvard

aware that never, until the lies were put in a legal pleading at the end of December 2014, it was never alleged that I had any sexual contact with Virginia Roberts. I know that it was alleged that I was a 11:38:46 witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. I was never a witness to any of

ears before you allege that this story about you was being made up out of whole cloth, that lawyers representing Jeffrey Epstein's victims, including Katherine Ezell, E-Z-E-L-L from Bob Josefsberg's office, who had filed the complaint alleging that you had -- excuse me, that Virginia 290 "Answer: No, ma‘am. "Qu

nt's MOTION to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Jane Doe #3 Pursuant to Rule 35 by Jeffrey Epstein. Response

5/05/2010) 538 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth A. Marra: Status Conference held on 5/6/2010. Adam Horowitz, Bradley Edwards, Katherine Ezell f r PI in iff nd Michael Pike, Robert Critton for Defendant. Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin, [email protected] (ir) (Entered: 05

nt's MOTION to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Jane Doe #3 Pursuant to Rule 35 by Jeffrey Epstein. Response

5/06/2010 538 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth A. Marra: Status Conference held on 5/6/2010. Adam Horowitz, Bradley Edwards. Katherine Ezell for Plaintiff and Michael Pike, Robert Critton for Defendant. Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin. 561-514-3768 / [email protected] (i

N WARRINER Hl SHAREHOLDERS *BOARD CERTIFIED ALSO ADMITTED TKENTUCKY 2 MAINE 3 MARYLAND 4 MASSACHUSETTS 5 MISSISSIPPI § NEW HAMPSHIRE 7 NEW JERSEY 8 VIRGINIA 9 WASHINGTON DC PARALEGALS: VIVIAN AYAN-TEJEDA ALYSSA A, DIEDWARDO RANDY M, DUFRESNE DAVID W, GILMORE JOHN C, HOPKINS DEBORAH M. KNAPP VINCENT L. L

f Marc Nurik Attorney RRA Margaret Berk Legal Assistant to Spencer Kuvin Maribel Matiska RRA Paralegal Mark Fistos Attorney RRA Mercedes Estrada Katherine Ezell’s Assistant MG Client (Epstein Case) Michael Wheeler Attorney RRA Mike Fisten Investigators RRA N.R. Client communication Nora Batian RRA Staff Pa