Epstein Secrets

d acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, t

al abuse Allegations. Rather, these records are an important part of this case, since they not only support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre, but also indisputably establish Edwards and Cassell’s strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. Moreover, contrary to assertions made i

uded that “at this juncture in the proceedings” details about the sexual abuse she had suffered was unnecessary to making a determination “of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join [the other victims’] claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details r

at question. I am aware that never before 2014, end of December, was it ever, ever alleged that I had acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, that Ihad ever been with her. I was completely aware ofthat. There had never been any allega

body had taken the photograph. Given the surrounding circumstances, I thought perhaps Mr. Epstein had taken the photograph. So that would have shown Virginia Roberts's sexual abuse was not confined just to Florida, not confined to the New York mansion; it would have -- it would have presumably continued into London

owerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was former Harvard

aware that never, until the lies were put in a legal pleading at the end of December 2014, it was never alleged that I had any sexual contact with Virginia Roberts. I know that it was alleged that I was a 11:38:46 witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. I was never a witness to any of

Records Page 19 of 20 Phone: (305)-350-5329 Fax: (305)-373-2294 Attorneys for Defendant Richard A. Simpson (pro hac vice) [email protected] Mary E. Borja (pro hac vice) [email protected] Ashley E. Eiler (pro hac vice) [email protected] WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K St. NW Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (2

fendant. PLAINTIFFS AND NON-PARTY CASE. NO. CACE 15-000072 NOTICE REGARDING THE PARTIES' JOINT SITPULATION OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs and Non-Party Virginia Giuffre, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby provide the Court with Notice that while the Plaintiff and Defendant submitted a Joint Stipulation of D

N OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs and Non-Party Virginia Giuffre, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby prov

ITPULATION OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs and Non-Party Virginia Giuffre, by and through undersigned counsel, here

5 ,‘,it it 4O- • se> :,SERVICE LIST O Thomas E. Sep! QA Thomas.scogittcsklegal.conqt Richard A. Simpson rsillipstiii a wiles. rein.ciiiii Mary E. Borja lithorja 4 \\ ilcyreilyont Ashley E. Filer aciLt a \\ ile3tem.oitti WILEY REIN, LLP 1776 K Street NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Counsel for Alan D

first met Epstein in 1999 and that Epstein "kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, w

Floor 9150 South Dadeland Boulevard Miami, Florida 33156 Phone: (305) 350-5300 Fax: (305) 373-2294 Richard A. Simpson (admitted pro hac vice) Mary E. Borja (admitted pro hac vice) Ashley E. Eiler (admitted pro hac vice) WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 20 EFTA00584081 Phone:

LAINTIFF ALAN DERSHOWITZ’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER OR RELIEF FROM THAT ORDER The transcript of the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”) is currently under seal as a result of the January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order in this action. Dershowitz seeks clarification that the

ranscript of the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”) is currently under seal as a result o

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER OR RELIEF FROM THAT ORDER The transcript of the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”) is currently under seal as a result of the January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order in this action. Dershowitz seeks clarification that the Confident

South Dadeland Boulevard Miami, Florida 33156 Phone: (305) 350-5300 Fax: (305) 373-2294 Richard A. Simpson (pro hac vice) [email protected] Mary E. Borja (pro hac vice) [email protected] Ashley E. Eiler (pro hac vice) [email protected] Nicole A. Richardson (pro hac vice) [email protected]

ts. It is without question that Giuffre was sexually abused as ' Jane Doe No. 3 is Virginia Roberts Giuffre, and will hereinafter be referred to as “Guiuffre.” > See Exhibit 1, CNN International, New Day, January 6, 2015. See also Exhibit 2, Australian Broadcasting System (ABC), January 6, 2015. “My goal

RSHOWITZ, Defendant. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT ALAN DERSHOWITZ’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER OR RELIEF FROM THAT ORDER Non-Party Virginia Giuffre, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby responds to Defendant Alan Dershowitz’s Motion for Clarification of Confidentiality Order or Relief From

ief From that Order and states as follows: FACTUAL BACKGROUND On November 12, 2015 this Court issued an Order granting in part, non-party Virginia Giuffre’s Motion to Quash the subpoena served by Defendant Alan Dershowitz and ordered protective limits relating to her deposition. See Exhibit A, November

“Evidence” of Perjury And Instead Is Simply Trying To Bully This Victim As explained above, Defendant Dershowitz wrongly suggests to this Court that non-party Virginia Giuffre has committed perjury in an effort to taint the Court against this victim. His only “evidence” of this alleged perjury is a self-serving opinion fro

that during Defendant Dershowitz’s recent deposition, counsel for Mr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell asked Defendant Dershowitz the following question: “Was Virginia Roberts lying when she said Jeffrey Epstein socialized with Bill Clinton during the relevant time period?” Depo Tr. Of Alan Dershowitz, Vol. 4, January 12, 2