Epstein Secrets

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3VOGIU1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Oral Argument x New York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 LO310 a.m, Before? HON. ROB

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3VOGIU1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Oral Argument x New York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 LO310 a.m, Before? HON. ROBERT W. SWEE

not just limited to the little snippets that they included in their complaint, it's the ntire statement. That entire statement talks about Virginia Giuffre's allegations against Ms. Maxwell have been proven untrue. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011307 10 id. 12 1

n I'm denying the motion to join is you can participate in the case in other ways without being a formal party." He cited, and I quote, "Of course, Jane Doe 3 can participate in this litigated effort to vindicate the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340 10 id. 12 13

we have a statement by Buckingham Palace that was issued on the internet and widely circulated. There is also a videotape of Prince Andrew denying Virginia Roberts' claims. Both of those were far more circulated than anything Ms. Maxwell said, as evidenced by the fact that plaintiff can't even find Ms. Maxwell's

ES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) GHISLAINE MAXW

onstrate that it is not what the defendant said about the plaintiff that causes her reputation to suffer but what others said." Plaintiff also cites Sack of Defamation. He supports our position, your Honor. Here, we have a statement by Buckingham Palace that was issued on the internet and widely circulated. There

that there are no courses taken between 22 1999 and the 2000 school year, and no courses taken during the 23 2000 to 2001 school years. 24 Ms. Giuffer's attempt to work and resume school at 25 another school as as a tenth grader in the 2001 to 2002 school SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212)

it is not what the defendant said about the 17 plaintiff that causes her reputation to suffer but what others 18 said." 19 Plaintiff also cites Sack of Defamation. He supports 20 our position, your Honor. Here, we have a statement by 21 Buckingham Palace that was issued on the internet and widely 22 circu

y do show is that there are no courses taken between 1999 and the 2000 school year, and no courses taken during the 2000 to 2001 school years. Ms. Giuffer's attempt to work and resume school at another school as as a tenth grader in the 2001 to 2002 school SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-

strate that it is not what the defendant said about the plaintiff that causes her reputation to suffer but what others said." Plaintiff also cites Sack of Defamation. He supports our position, your Honor. Here, we have a statement by Buckingham Palace that was issued on the internet and widely circulated. There